Warp Drive & Bubble Theory: Can You See & Touch It?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of warp drive and the associated "bubble" theory, exploring whether such a bubble would be visible and tangible if it were to exist. The conversation touches on theoretical implications, scientific feasibility, and speculative ideas related to warp drives in the context of physics and science fiction.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the existence of warp drives, citing the need for exotic matter and astronomical energy requirements as significant barriers.
  • One participant mentions a theoretical approach to warp bubbles that could potentially reduce energy requirements by altering the bubble's dimensions, though this does not resolve other challenges such as radiation and control mechanisms.
  • Another participant questions the visibility of a warp bubble, comparing the inquiry to asking about the color of a mythical creature, suggesting that the question may not have a meaningful scientific basis.
  • Some participants argue that while theoretical videos depict warp bubbles, the actual physics of warping space-time may not result in a visible bubble, raising concerns about the accuracy of such representations.
  • A later reply suggests that the visibility of a warp bubble would depend on its strength and dimensions, indicating that there may be conditions under which it could be seen.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the feasibility and implications of warp drive theories, with some expressing skepticism about the scientific basis of the concepts discussed. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the visibility and physical characteristics of a hypothetical warp bubble.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the speculative nature of warp drive theories, the dependence on unproven concepts like exotic matter, and the lack of consensus on the visibility of warp bubbles.

Reptile202
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
I'm sure a lot of you have heard of the warp drive theory. I can't seem to find much on the bubble part, though. In theory, will the bubble be something you can actually see and touch?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
If you are referring to a warp drive from Star Trek or other sci-fi, it doesn't work according to known laws of physics so we cannot say anything about it.
 
At some point last year I looked into papers discussing the possibility of a warp drive, there's no indication that one could exist. Reason being that it would require exotic matter that probably doesn't exist (as it would violate energy conditions) and if it did would require astronomical amounts of energy. If you're interested this paper outlines the energy requirements and this paper which is further discussed in this paper proposes possible ways of getting around this . The "trick" is to change the warp bubble so that it's exterior radius is microscopic yet the interior radius is large enough to accommodate your vehicle (essentially making a warp bubble that's bigger on the inside than on the out). Apparently this would greatly shrink the amount of energy needed to manageable levels. Bear in mind though they don't outline how exactly a shell could be build around a ship in such a fashion nor how the ship could leave.

However neither of these approaches fixes the other problems of a warp bubble such as requiring the construction of an exotic matter shell, superluminal signalling to steer/control the bubble and the huge amount of radiation a warp drive subjects you to. There are some interesting (but technical) objections in this paper that apparently show that a warp drive would only be capable of very low velocities as well as highlighting other problems.

So without exotic matter that may not even exist we are stuck to trying to make slower than light vehicles. To make an interstellar vehicle would be fantastically complex though requiring horrific amounts of energy (even if we used an antimatter rocket we would need potentially thousands-millions of tonnes for a high fraction of c.) as well as a thorough understanding of ecology so as to make a stable environment in a closed system to keep the occupants alive.
 
Ryan_m_b said:
At some point last year I looked into papers discussing the possibility of a warp drive, there's no indication that one could exist. Reason being that it would require exotic matter that probably doesn't exist (as it would violate energy conditions) and if it did would require astronomical amounts of energy. If you're interested this paper outlines the energy requirements and this paper which is further discussed in this paper proposes possible ways of getting around this . The "trick" is to change the warp bubble so that it's exterior radius is microscopic yet the interior radius is large enough to accommodate your vehicle (essentially making a warp bubble that's bigger on the inside than on the out). Apparently this would greatly shrink the amount of energy needed to manageable levels. Bear in mind though they don't outline how exactly a shell could be build around a ship in such a fashion nor how the ship could leave.

However neither of these approaches fixes the other problems of a warp bubble such as requiring the construction of an exotic matter shell, superluminal signalling to steer/control the bubble and the huge amount of radiation a warp drive subjects you to. There are some interesting (but technical) objections in this paper that apparently show that a warp drive would only be capable of very low velocities as well as highlighting other problems.

So without exotic matter that may not even exist we are stuck to trying to make slower than light vehicles. To make an interstellar vehicle would be fantastically complex though requiring horrific amounts of energy (even if we used an antimatter rocket we would need potentially thousands-millions of tonnes for a high fraction of c.) as well as a thorough understanding of ecology so as to make a stable environment in a closed system to keep the occupants alive.

In theory, if one existed, would it actually be a bubble visible to the naked eye?
 
Reptile202 said:
In theory, if one existed, would it actually be a bubble visible to the naked eye?
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure your question makes about as much sense as asking me what the colour of a unicorn's horn is, if one were to exist.
 
Ryan_m_b said:
I could be wrong but I'm pretty sure your question makes about as much sense as asking me what the colour of a unicorn's horn is, if one were to exist.

All theoretical videos I've seen on them are showing an actual bubble in the diagrams. However, warping space-time doesn't seem like it'd make an actual visible bubble..that's capable of being seen. Which is why I asked. Too many videos use special effects.
 
Reptile202 said:
All theoretical videos I've seen on them are showing an actual bubble in the diagrams. However, warping space-time doesn't seem like it'd make an actual visible bubble..that's capable of being seen. Which is why I asked. Too many videos use special effects.

Are you being ignorant on purpose?

There are no "theoretical" videos on warp drives because that would require a theory in the first place. Any proposals for Alcubierre drives (Warp drives) possesses about as much scientific theory as my own idea that only invisible pigs can fly and that why we don't know about it.

The point I am making is you are asking for a scientific and reasonable answer on something wholly unscientific and unreasonable. This is like me asking: if gandalf and professor dumbledore had a wizarding battle then in theory who would win... it is a question without a meaningful answer.

So the "theoretical" videos show a warp bubble as a bubble on something that is a massive object violating traveling ftl. I am wondering how they would ever "see" that...

If you are looking for some advice for a sci-fi novel (we have had a few on the forums) then that's good, but if you are undertaking some research for youself your time is better spent. There are things within Cosmology that can blow your mind without invoking a large dolloping of handwavium.
 
Reptile202 said:
In theory, if one existed, would it actually be a bubble visible to the naked eye?

The warp bubble affects light propagation. It would depend on strength and dimension of the bubble if this is visible to the naked eye.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K