Was the Battle of Agincourt as One-Sided as History Claims?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Astronuc
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Battle of Agincourt, fought on October 25, 1415, is traditionally viewed as a remarkable English victory against overwhelming odds. Recent research by historians, including Anne Curry from the University of Southampton, challenges the narrative that the English were outnumbered five to one, suggesting instead that the actual ratio was closer to two to one or even an equal fight. This reassessment is based on a thorough examination of military and tax records from the period, which calls into question the reliability of medieval chroniclers' accounts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of medieval military history
  • Familiarity with historical research methodologies
  • Knowledge of primary source analysis
  • Basic comprehension of the socio-political context of 15th-century England and France
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the methodologies used in historical reassessment studies
  • Explore the impact of the longbow on medieval warfare
  • Investigate the socio-economic conditions of England and France during the 15th century
  • Examine other significant battles and their historical narratives
USEFUL FOR

Historians, military enthusiasts, students of medieval studies, and anyone interested in the evolution of historical narratives and their implications on national identity.

Astronuc
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
22,582
Reaction score
7,536
Historians Reassess Battle of Agincourt
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/25/world/europe/25agincourt.html

MAISONCELLE, France — The heavy clay-laced mud behind the cattle pen on Antoine Renault’s farm looks as treacherous as it must have been nearly 600 years ago, when King Henry V rode from a spot near here to lead a sodden and exhausted English Army against a French force that was said to outnumber his by as much as five to one.

No one can ever take away the shocking victory by Henry and his “band of brothers,” as Shakespeare would famously call them, on St. Crispin’s Day, Oct. 25, 1415. They devastated a force of heavily armored French nobles who had gotten bogged down in the region’s sucking mud, riddled by thousands of arrows from English longbowmen and outmaneuvered by common soldiers with much lighter gear. It would become known as the Battle of Agincourt.

But Agincourt’s status as perhaps the greatest victory against overwhelming odds in military history — and a keystone of the English self-image — has been called into doubt by a group of historians in Britain and France who have painstakingly combed an array of military and tax records from that time and now take a skeptical view of the figures handed down by medieval chroniclers.

The historians have concluded that the English could not have been outnumbered by more than about two to one. And depending on how the math is carried out, Henry may well have faced something closer to an even fight, said Anne Curry, a professor at the University of Southampton who is leading the study.
. . . .

Related site - http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/index.php

I found only one relative who was an archer.

The Soldier in later Medieval England
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/som.php
http://www.icmacentre.ac.uk/soldier/database/conf.php
www.medievalsoldier.org
 
Science news on Phys.org
Thanks for the links provided, makes for some interesting reading.
 
This is interesting reserch, but a long way to go before accepted history gets changed I think. Even if the numbers were quite even, it was still a great victory as a group of archers defeated a group of better trained, higher class knights.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
786
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
11K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
11K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K