Water Powered Car: Is HHO a Viable Option?

  • Thread starter Thread starter theCandyman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the viability of using HHO (hydrogen and oxygen) as a fuel source for cars, particularly in the context of a process claimed by Denny Klein that converts water into HHO. Participants explore the implications of this process, its energy efficiency, and the scientific principles involved.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant mentions a claim that Denny Klein's process allows a car to travel 100 miles on just 4 ounces of water, questioning the feasibility of such a claim given the laws of thermodynamics.
  • Another participant argues that HHO is simply another term for water (H2O) and expresses skepticism about the terminology used, suggesting it may indicate a lack of scientific credibility.
  • A different participant explains that if the process converts water into hydrogen and oxygen, it would not produce more energy than is consumed, emphasizing that energy output cannot exceed input.
  • One participant raises a question about the nature of the reaction, speculating whether the heat observed could be due to oxidation rather than the claimed energy production from HHO.
  • Another participant outright states that the concept is a scam.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express skepticism about the claims made regarding HHO as a viable fuel source, with no consensus reached on the validity of the process or its energy efficiency. Multiple competing views remain regarding the scientific basis of the claims.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the laws of thermodynamics and hydrolysis, indicating a need for clarity on the definitions and processes involved. There is uncertainty about the terminology and the scientific validity of the claims made by proponents of HHO technology.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in alternative fuel sources, energy efficiency, and the scientific principles of hydrogen production may find this discussion relevant.

theCandyman
Messages
397
Reaction score
2
Hopefully this belongs here, I see a few other threads on hydrogen power, so I guess I am safe.

My brother showed me a clip of an article off some new program about a man named Denny Klein who recently "patented his process of converting H2O to HHO." He was using the result in weilding, but he was able to stick his hand in the flame and still when he turned it on a piece of metal, it melted. Then he had the idea of using it to power his car, claiming that in the results it took only 4 ounces to travel 100 miles in his gas-water hybird car.

I know I read recently on these forums that there was someone who tried to sell a car that ran on water, with the claim that his catalyst helped break down water into hydrogen and oxygen, but I could not find it. They also explained the law of thermodynamics that refuted whatever the nut claimed about his engine. This would not happen to be the same guy, would it?

Here's is the link my brother got this from: http://digg.com/technology/Water_Fuel_-_HHO_Gas - You can watch the video clip here.
I tried reading what everyone was saying, but on there even the uninformed seemed to act as if they knew what they were talking about, which quickly turned confusing.

To finally get around to my question, could this process ever produce net energy (he already admits it uses more than it produces)? And what is HHO; hydrogen bonded to hydrogen and oxygen, instead of oxygen bonded to two hydrogen perhaps (strikes me as odd, because H2 is stable by itself)?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
HHO is just another way of writing H2O. I don't have time to check the link (and I've had several beers), but anything that uses that sort of terminology is probably crackpot.
 
He says the only product of whatever reaction is happening is water. That means he somehow took water, converted it into a higher energy molecule (say hydrogen and oxygen gas), and then obtained work as the molecules converted back into lower energy water.

You're not going to get more energy back than you put in. You'll just get less.

If anything it would make more sense to run the cars off of electricity directly than to use that electricity to do some magic voodoo to water that gives it energy.
 
Last edited:
Since he talked about hydrolysis in the interview, I thought it might just be hydrogen and oxygen. Would his hand not get burned and the metal heat up because of oxidation?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
12K
Replies
7
Views
3K