Would it be correct to say, that the observer's wave function is 'always collapsed'? I.e. that the observer can always be completely described by a bit string, while everything else only by a 'qbit string'.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Wave function of an observer, 'always collapsed'?

Loading...

Similar Threads - Wave function observer | Date |
---|---|

A Hermitian conjugate of the derivative of a wave function | Feb 21, 2018 |

B Observing a Wave function | Mar 7, 2017 |

B Double Slit detectors question | Oct 26, 2016 |

Different wave function for different observers? | Feb 12, 2016 |

Does the breakdown of the wave function need a concsious observer? | May 23, 2011 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**