Wave function of particles approching 0 K

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of particle wave functions as they approach absolute zero temperature (0 K), exploring theoretical implications, energy states, and the potential for macroscopic quantum phenomena. Participants examine concepts related to wave function size, energy states, and specific particle types in low-temperature conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that particles cooled to near 0 K could have wave functions extending to the size of galaxies, contingent on remaining cooled long enough.
  • Others argue that 0 K represents a minimum energy state rather than zero energy, suggesting that wave functions do not necessarily need to spread out significantly.
  • A participant questions whether fundamental barriers exist that would prevent a small macroscopic aggregate from having a high probability of being located within a galaxy at extremely low temperatures.
  • It is noted that achieving a wave function spread over galactic scales would require switching off all interactions with other particles, which is currently not feasible.
  • Some participants mention that the thermal de Broglie wavelength of non-interacting particles becomes infinite as temperature approaches zero, indicating a theoretical aspect of wave function behavior.
  • There is a discussion about specific particles, such as neutrinos and WIMPs, and their potential to exhibit large wave functions at low temperatures.
  • Participants clarify that the ground state of harmonic oscillators does not equate to zero energy, emphasizing the distinction between zero energy and zero temperature.
  • One participant introduces the concept of Bose-Einstein condensation in liquid He-4 as an example of macroscopic quantum behavior at low temperatures, where wave functions overlap significantly.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of reaching 0 K, the nature of energy states, and the feasibility of achieving large wave functions. There is no consensus on the fundamental barriers to macroscopic aggregates or the behavior of specific particles at low temperatures.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of energy and temperature, as well as unresolved questions regarding the interactions between particles and the conditions necessary for achieving large wave functions.

nehorlavazapal
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Am I right to think that particles cooled asymptotically to 0 K would have wave functions the size of galaxies or even larger (provided they would stay cooled long enough for that light cone---).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
0 K is the ground state assuming it is not degenerated[/size]. This can still have a finite energy if the material is trapped somewhere. It does not need to spread out so large.
 
Yes, of course. I was only asking if it is possible in theory..at let's say 10^-20 K. For example if vacuum fluctuations would collapse the wave function into a smaller volume.
 
Please reread mfb's answer. 0K does not mean zero energy, it means minimum energy.
 
Yes, please forgive me if I am missing sometihing: I would rather reformulate my question: are there any fundamental bariers that would prevent a small macroscopic agregate (like 10^6 atoms) from having a 95 % probability of being inside a galaxy via extremely low associated energy? For exampe is there any fundamental real limit on the "bond energy" inside that atomic cluster?
 
All our atoms are within our galaxy with (practical) certainty.
To get the wavefunction of a particle (or even a set of particles) spread out over the scale of a galaxy, you would have to switch off all interactions with other particles. There is no known way to do that.
 
The answer by mfb is very good.

The thermal de Broglie wavelength of non-interacting particles becomes infinite as temperature approaches zero.
 
Yes, that's what I have meant. Are there any particles that would come close.. like a few kilometers, i.e. very cold neutrinos or WIMPs?
 
Photons can easily do that. Use a flashlight and point it towards the sky. That's not in thermal equilibrium then, of course.
I guess neutrinos can work as well.
 
  • #10
Well the ground state of the harmonic oscillators for example, doesn't have 0 energy, and so it won't have 0 temperature...
[E]=[k_{B}][T]
So how can we say it can reach for example T=0 at GS?
 
  • #11
ChrisVer said:
Well the ground state of the harmonic oscillators for example, doesn't have 0 energy, and so it won't have 0 temperature...
Zero energy has nothing to do with zero temperature.
Actually, "zero energy" is an arbitrary definition. Zero temperature is not, it is defined via entropy.
Your equation just matches with units, but not with the physics.
 
  • #12
nehorlavazapal said:
Yes, that's what I have meant. Are there any particles that would come close.. like a few kilometers, i.e. very cold neutrinos or WIMPs?

I'm not quite sure what you are after. Cooling and thermalizing neutrinos is not possible. What first comes to my mind as an example of macroscopic quantum behavior is liquid He-4 at low temperatures. In a many-body system of identical bosons, the system condenses to its lowest energy state at some low temperature and the particles lose their identity (Bose-Einstein condensation for non-interacting particles). The onset of this transition usually occurs when "the wave functions of the atoms begin to overlap", i.e. when the thermal de Broglie wavelength is of the order of the interatomic separation. Superfluid He-4 can be described by a macroscopic wave function. And actually the dimensions of the container begin to limit the properties of the system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
765