Wave-Particle Duality and Particle Specific Identification

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of particle momentum within a field and the implications of observation in quantum mechanics (QM). Participants explore the challenges of identifying particles over time and the assumptions involved in treating observed particles as identical.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to measure a particle's momentum without disrupting the field and whether it is valid to assume that observed particles are identical over time.
  • Another participant asserts that QM does not provide information about particles when they are not observed and suggests that it is simpler to assume the particles are the same when observed again.
  • A participant expresses a desire to understand the concepts better, noting their background in applied mathematics and interest in multivariate public key cryptography, while highlighting the significance of "spin" in research.
  • Another participant recommends specific books on QM and related topics, suggesting that those with a mathematical background can directly engage with more advanced texts.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding particle identity and the implications of observation in QM. There is no consensus on the validity of treating observed particles as identical.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference the limitations of QM and its relationship to Quantum Field Theory, noting that some conceptual issues may be resolved by adopting a field-based perspective. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity involved in understanding these concepts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals interested in quantum mechanics, particularly those with a background in mathematics or those exploring the philosophical implications of particle observation and identity.

ir316507
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have been struggling with one simple question. How can one measure the momentum of a particle within a field without disrupting the entire field, all together? If the particle is under observation at at t_0, how is it verifiable that at t_1 the same particle is being observed? Obviously spin and the state of the field can be determined in certain instances, but is it presumptuous to assume that the observed particles are identical?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course you can't say anything about a particle when its not observed. When you observe it next who knows if its the same particle or what it is. QM is silent about any of that. But why make life hard for yourself and the world weirder than it has to be. Its easiest assuming its the same particle so simply do that.

If you are just starting out in QM I suggest the following:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0473179768/?tag=pfamazon01-20

QM is in fact an approximation to a deeper theory called Quantum Field Theory. By treating everything as a field a number of conceptual issues disappear and is how I suggest you start out. The above book is quite good and unique in its approach. Although some comments he makes about Feynman are off the mark. He attributes Feynman's comment about the shell game played with field theory to field theory itself - it wasn't - it was with regard to renormalisation which has now been resolved through the work of Wilson and others on effective field theory.

Thanks
Bill
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks Bill

I am somewhat new to the concepts, so it would be ideal for me to gain a better understanding. I am an applied mathematics major with possible interests in multivariate public key cryptography. I noticed "spin" seems to be the central focus of the available research.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K