Wave/Particle Duality: Observing Reality Differently?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter beatlemaniacj
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Duality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the wave-particle duality of photons, exploring how different observers perceive photons as either waves or particles. Participants examine the implications of these observations on the nature of reality and the conditions under which these states can be observed. The conversation touches on theoretical, experimental, and conceptual aspects of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that the observation of a photon as a wave or a particle is determined by the measurement method, leading to questions about whether reality differs for each observer.
  • Others argue that once a photon is measured, it is forced into a particle state, suggesting that all observers will see the same particle state at any given time.
  • A participant mentions that the wave state can only be inferred from the effects on the photon, not directly observed, and suggests the possibility of a transient state between wave and particle.
  • One participant describes a scenario involving ultrafast laser spectroscopy, questioning how a single peak of light can exhibit wave-like behavior while being fundamentally a particle.
  • Another participant asserts that a single photon is always observed as a particle and that interference patterns arise from multiple photons, not from a single photon alone.
  • Some participants discuss the theoretical implications of a single photon interfering with itself, noting that while this is a theoretical claim, it cannot be experimentally verified with just one photon.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of photons and the implications of their observations. While some assert that photons are fundamentally particles, others emphasize the wave-like behavior observed under certain conditions. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing perspectives on the topic.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding the definitions of wave and particle states, the conditions under which these states can be observed, and the assumptions about measurement effects. The relationship between single photons and interference patterns is also a point of contention.

beatlemaniacj
Messages
49
Reaction score
0
If a photon can be observed as a wave or a particle, and that observation decides whether it is in fact a wave or a particle, what happens when to observers observe the same particle differently? Is it both? Is reality different for each observer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
beatlemaniacj said:
If a photon can be observed as a wave or a particle, and that observation decides whether it is in fact a wave or a particle, what happens when to observers observe the same particle differently? Is it both? Is reality different for each observer?

measurement/detection by any observer forces/converts the photon into the "particle state"

thus all other observers will only see the particle face/side, no matter how they choose to observe

the reality is same for all observers

particle and wave states cannot be observed at the same time, even if we have more than one observer and they are using different observation methods..

to be more precise/technical -- wave state can never be observed...it can only be inferred...based on the effect of the wave on the behavior of the photon...

it's not about the observer, its about the photon...it can either be in wave state or particle state...and every observer will see the same state at any given instance of time

though, i think, a partial wave state and partial particle state might be possible...for at least infinitesimally small periods of time
 
Last edited:
So a wave/particle in an observer tank appears. In Sweden a researcher observes it as a wave. In America, a researcher observes it as a particle. Lease give a slution where time is negligible and where it is not.
 
The smallest portion you can observe is a single photon. And a single photon is always observed as a particle! If you observe a wave-like phenomenon (e.g. an interference pattern) this is always created by interference of many photons (you can have a single photon interfering with itself, but it never creates an interference pattern, it always creates a single, point-like spot or something like that).
 
I thought I had this sorted out years ago but now thinking about it, I'm not so sure.

Lets take ultrafast laser spectroscopy. A "flash" of light is a wavetrain. As the wavetrain gets shorter and shorter, eventually it will be just 1 peak; you can't have less light than 1 peak.

this is a wave description of the light.

now, this 1 peak can still suffer destructive and constructive interference like a wave if we had another ultrafast laser aimed the right way, very hard practically of course. this ultrashort "wavetrain" could also be diffracted by a 2 slit experiment.

How would this work out?
 
I am not an expert in laser spectroscopy and quantum optics but as long as you have a large number of photons in that ultrashort peak you would observe interference (for a very short time). No problemn with that theoretically.
 
beatlemaniacj said:
If a photon can be observed as a wave or a particle, and that observation decides whether it is in fact a wave or a particle, what happens when to observers observe the same particle differently? Is it both? Is reality different for each observer?

It is not a wave - it is a particle - simple as that. However it is a particle that obeys the rules of QM and has interference effects etc like a wave - but in reality it is a particle pure and simple.

Thanks
Bill
 
tom.stoer said:
The smallest portion you can observe is a single photon. And a single photon is always observed as a particle! If you observe a wave-like phenomenon (e.g. an interference pattern) this is always created by interference of many photons (you can have a single photon interfering with itself, but it never creates an interference pattern, it always creates a single, point-like spot or something like that).

True - a single photon can not create an interference pattern but it will give away that it is interfering with itself by never being detected at certain points.

Thanks
Bill
 
bhobba said:
True - a single photon can not create an interference pattern but it will give away that it is interfering with itself by never being detected at certain points.
That's correct, but you are not able to check this experimentatlly by just using one single photon; you always need multiple photons, either in a beam or single photons in many identical experiments. So in a sense we claim theoretically that a photon can (and does) interfer with itself, but we know that we can never check this directly. The best we can do is to look at the interference pattern created by many individual photons where we make sure that for a certain time interval T=L/c only one single photon does exist inside the experimental setup (with a typical size L).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K