Wavelength Speed: 10nm vs 1mm - Does UV Travel Faster?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fonzi03
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Wavelength
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the speed of light at different wavelengths, specifically comparing 10nm UV light to 1mm IR light. It concludes that the speed of light remains constant regardless of wavelength, as all electromagnetic waves travel at approximately 299,792 kilometers per second in a vacuum. The argument presented suggests that while the distance may differ, the speed does not change based on wavelength. The analogy of water waves is used to illustrate the concept of wave motion versus distance traveled.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with the speed of light in a vacuum
  • Basic knowledge of wave properties (wavelength, frequency, amplitude)
  • Concept of transverse waves and their behavior
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of electromagnetic waves and their speed
  • Study the relationship between wavelength and frequency in light
  • Explore the differences between transverse and longitudinal waves
  • Investigate the effects of medium on the speed of light
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, students of optics, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of light and wave phenomena.

Fonzi03
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Would light at 10nm be traveling at a slower speed due to having to go a shorter distance than light at 1mm? The IR light is traveling a straighter line to its destination than the UV so for both of them to arrive at the same time the UV must be going faster in order to make up time and be at the same destination at the same time as the IR right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's back up and think about water waves. If you throw a stick in the ocean, the waves don't wash it up on the shore. (That only happens if there's a wind.) The wave pattern moves smoothly in one direction, toward the beach. The water oscillates. The two motions are completely different.

A transverse wave isn't traveling along a sinudoidal path, so it's not right to imagine that there is extra distance involved.
 
Maybe better to consider the peaks & troughs of a wavelength as "phases", but not a traveled distance.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 98 ·
4
Replies
98
Views
8K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K