I Weak Interaction Hamiltonian V-A Structure Derivation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the V-A structure of the weak interaction Hamiltonian, referencing the 1958 paper by Feynman and Gell-Mann. The key argument is that only the vector (V) and axial vector (A) contributions should remain after applying the left chiral projection. However, the user encounters an issue when combining these contributions, resulting in a form that lacks the expected V-A structure and the associated coupling term. They seek clarification on where their derivation deviates from the correct approach. The conversation highlights the complexities involved in the mathematical formulation of weak interactions.
deuteron
Messages
64
Reaction score
14
TL;DR
the Hamiltonian I end up with is very different than the usual V-A structure, and I don't know why
Hi! I am trying to come to the V-A structure of the weak interaction Hamiltonian, but I am having some issues with it.
In Feynman & Gell-Mann 1958 paper, they argue that each particle field must be projected onto its left chiral component, which means:

$$H=\displaystyle\sum_{i=S,V,T,A,P} C_i (\overline{\psi_n } O_i \psi_p )(\overline{\psi_\nu} O_i \psi_e) \to \displaystyle\sum_i C_i ([\overline{P_L\psi_n}] O_i [P_L\psi_p]) ([\overline{P_L\psi_\nu}] O_i[P_L\psi_e])$$

and then, they argue that since ##P_L^2 = P_L##, and ##P_RP_L=0##,
$$S:\quad P_RP_L=0,
\quad P: \quad P_R\gamma_5 P_L = -P_RP_L = 0,
\quad T:\quad P_R\sigma_{\mu\nu} P_L = \sigma_{\mu\nu} P_RP_L = 0,
\quad V:\quad P_R\gamma_\mu P_L = \gamma_\mu P_LP_L=\gamma_\mu P_L,
\quad A:\quad P_R\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 P_L = \gamma_\mu P_L\gamma_5P_L = -\gamma_\mu P_LP_L=-\gamma_\mu P_L$$
so, only the V and A contributions must survive.

And this is where I start to have a problem, because when I only take the V and A contributions, I get:
$$H =C_V ( \overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu P_L \psi_n)(\overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu P_L \psi_e) + C_A(\overline{\psi_p}(-\gamma_\mu P_L) \psi_n)(\overline{\psi_\nu} (-\gamma_\mu P_L) \psi_e)
\\ = C_V ( \overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu P_L \psi_n)(\overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu P_L \psi_e) + C_A(\overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu P_L \psi_n)(\overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu P_L \psi_e)
\\ = (C_V+C_A) (\overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu P_L \psi_n)(\overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu P_L \psi_e)
\\ = \frac {C_V+C_A}4 ( \overline{\psi_p} \gamma_\mu (1-\gamma_5) \psi_n)(\overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu (1-\gamma_5) \psi_e)
\\ = \frac{C_V+C_A}4 [ \overline{\psi_p} \gamma_\mu \psi_n - \overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \psi_n ] [ \overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu \psi_e - \overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu\gamma_5 \psi_e]
\\ = \frac{C_V+C_A}4 [(\overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu \psi_n )(\overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu \psi_e ) -(\overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu \psi_n ) ( \overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu\gamma_5 \psi_e) + (\overline{\psi_p}\gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \psi_n) ( \overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \psi_e)-(\overline{\psi_p} \gamma_\mu \gamma_5 \psi_n )(\overline{\psi_\nu} \gamma_\mu \psi_e) ]$$

And this does not have the V-A structure, or the term with the ##\lambda## whatsoever. My question is: at which step am I doing something wrong?

Thanks for reading so far :)
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...