Well-Definedness and C^Infinity Closure of Convolutions

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TaylorM0192
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    closure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving the well-definedness and C closure of the convolution of two functions, f and g, where f is continuous and g is a C function with compact support on R. The user successfully demonstrated that the convolution (f*g) is well-defined due to the Riemann integrability of fg and the compact support of g. They utilized the difference quotient method and the Mean Value Theorem to establish the proof, which effectively aligns with Leibniz's Rule for differentiation under the integral sign.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of convolution operations in functional analysis
  • Familiarity with Riemann integrability and compact support concepts
  • Knowledge of C functions and their properties
  • Basic principles of differentiation under the integral sign
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of C functions and their implications in convolution
  • Learn about Riemann integrability and its role in defining convolutions
  • Explore Leibniz's Rule for differentiation under the integral sign in depth
  • Investigate the applications of convolution in approximation to the identity problems
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students in advanced calculus or functional analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of convolutions and their applications in analysis.

TaylorM0192
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hello,

Let me first just say, I posted this thread on mathhelpforum.com - but I read a post by Plato somewhere or another recommending here instead, since apparently the other site had some bad customer service issues... (:

I want to prove that if given two functions f and g (f is assumed continuous; g is assumed C^infinity with compact support on R), their convolution (f*g) is (a) well defined and (b) an element of C^infinity. The idea is to later use this result for some problems concerning "approximation to the identity."

Proving well-definedness is easy since (fg) is Riemann integrable and g is compactly supported, so the convolution does not diverge and is finite for all real x.

I am aware of a result back from lower-division DE class that the derivative of the convolution can be "transferred" to either f or g; but, I don't know how to prove this. If someone could lead me in that direction, I think I would be able to prove the result from there.

I also saw a proof where the Fourier transform was used; but, I want to avoid using Fourier analysis (and indeed, more sophisticated proofs involving Young/Minkowski inequalities, elements of functional analysis, measure theory, Lebesgue integration, etc.), and limit myself to just basic concepts concerning L^2 functions (i.e. mean convergence, Holder's inequality, etc.) if these concepts apply at all to any possible proofs.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TaylorM0192 said:
Hello,

Let me first just say, I posted this thread on mathhelpforum.com - but I read a post by Plato somewhere or another recommending here instead, since apparently the other site had some bad customer service issues... (:

I want to prove that if given two functions f and g (f is assumed continuous; g is assumed C^infinity with compact support on R), their convolution (f*g) is (a) well defined and (b) an element of C^infinity. The idea is to later use this result for some problems concerning "approximation to the identity."

Proving well-definedness is easy since (fg) is Riemann integrable and g is compactly supported, so the convolution does not diverge and is finite for all real x.

I am aware of a result back from lower-division DE class that the derivative of the convolution can be "transferred" to either f or g; but, I don't know how to prove this. If someone could lead me in that direction, I think I would be able to prove the result from there.

I also saw a proof where the Fourier transform was used; but, I want to avoid using Fourier analysis (and indeed, more sophisticated proofs involving Young/Minkowski inequalities, elements of functional analysis, measure theory, Lebesgue integration, etc.), and limit myself to just basic concepts concerning L^2 functions (i.e. mean convergence, Holder's inequality, etc.) if these concepts apply at all to any possible proofs.

Thanks!
Won't Leibniz's rule for differentiation an integral with variable limits do this for you? (together with the observation that the derivative a compactly supported \(C^{\infty}\) function is also a compactly supported \(C^{\infty}\) function )

CB
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the hint CaptainBlack - I actually proved it this morning by simply setting up the difference quotient, combining the difference of integrals, and then interchanging the separate limits which occur (one where h->0 and the other the integral itself; this is valid once we prove the derivative converges uniformly) and then also a quick application of the Mean Value Theorem to rewrite one of the occurring terms.

If someone wants a solution, I can write it up, but it doesn't seem like there was too much interest in this problem prior to solving it. :O

Btw CB, it seems my proof is basically a proof of Leibnizs' Rule anyhow; therefore, I don't think we were allowed to assume this lol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K