What Are Basic Questions About Understanding Inequalities?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter paulb203
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequalities
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the understanding of inequalities, particularly in the context of GCSE-level mathematics. Participants explore the definitions, symbols, and implications of inequalities, addressing both theoretical and conceptual aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether the expressions in the inequalities are correctly identified, specifically asking if 7 and x are the expressions in "7 > x" and x and -4 in "x ≤ -4".
  • Another participant clarifies that if x = -4, then both x ≤ -4 and x ≥ -4 hold true, suggesting that inequalities can include equalities.
  • There is a discussion about the meaning of x ≤ -4, with participants confirming that x can take values less than or equal to -4, including -4 itself.
  • Some participants propose a more nuanced definition of inequalities, stating they represent relationships between expressions that can have values not necessarily equal to one another.
  • Participants note the importance of inequality symbols, distinguishing between strict inequalities ( < and > ) and non-strict inequalities ( ≤ and ≥ ).
  • There is a mention of how inequalities are useful in mathematical contexts, such as defining domains for functions.
  • One participant emphasizes the significance of understanding negations in inequalities, such as how NOT (x < 4) translates to x ≥ 4.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying interpretations of the definitions and implications of inequalities, with no clear consensus reached on some points, particularly regarding the simplifications made in educational resources.

Contextual Notes

Some definitions and explanations provided by participants may depend on specific mathematical contexts or interpretations, and there are unresolved nuances regarding the use of inequality symbols.

paulb203
Messages
196
Reaction score
76
TL;DR
Why are there greater than or EQUAL to / less than or EQUAL to signs involved when it comes to INEQUALITIES if it's supposed to be about expressions that are NOT EQUAL to one another?
Hello. I have a GCSE level (or below) question about inequalities. I got the following from BBC Bitesize https://www.bbc.co.uk/bitesize/guides/z9vkqhv/revision/1

"Inequalities are the relationships between two expressions which are not equal to one another. The symbols used for inequalities are <, >, ≤, ≥.

7>x reads as '7 is greater than x' (or 'x is less than 7', reading from right to left).

x≤−4 reads as 'x is less than or equal to -4' (or '-4 is greater than or equal to x', reading from right to left)."

I have two questions regards the above.
Are 7 and x the two expressions in the first example? Are x and -4 the two expressions in the second example?
And, why are there greater than or EQUAL to / less than or EQUAL to signs involved if this is about expressions which are NOT EQUAL to one another?
Regards the second example, for example (x is less than or equal to -4) ; what if x is -4? Then it's equal to -4 and not an 'inequality', yes/no?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
matthewphilip said:
Regards the second example, for example (x is less than or equal to -4) ; what if x is -4? Then it's equal to -4 and not an 'inequality', yes/no?
No. If ##x = -4## then a) ##x \le -4## and b) ##x \ge -4##.

Why do we have inequalities like ##x \ge 0##? Because they are useful. For example, the equation ##y = \sqrt x## is valid for ##x \ge 0##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
Thanks, PeroK. To check I've got the very basics before I ask about your answer; does x is less than or equal to -4 mean that the value of x could be -4, or -3, or -2, etc, etc?
 
matthewphilip said:
Thanks, PeroK. To check I've got the very basics before I ask about your answer; does x is less than or equal to -4 mean that the value of x could be -4, or -3, or -2, etc, etc?
We use a variable such as ##x## in two related, but subtlely different, cases in mathematics:

1) As an "unknown". Here ##x## is some number that we do not know, although we may be able to work out what it is. Or, we may be talking hypothetically about some particular number. For example:

##x## could be the length of an object in metres.

In this case, we might do some measurements that show that ##x < 10##. That is then some information about our unknown number.

2) As a "variable" that is allowed to take all values in some domain. In this case, ##x## stands for each and every number in the domain. This is especially important when we talk about graphs and functions. We talk about the "x-axis", where ##x## represents each and every number along the number line. Not just one unknown number, as in case 1).

In this case, we may restrict our domain - e.g. the function ##y = \sqrt x## is only valid for ##x \ge 0##. So, here ##x## represents each and every non-negative number.

It was a huge insight by Descartes, I believe, to develop the idea of the variable ##x## in case 2). The ancient mathematicians tended to see ##x## only as in case 1) and that held back the development of mathematics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203 and Lnewqban
matthewphilip said:
Thanks, PeroK. To check I've got the very basics before I ask about your answer; does x is less than or equal to -4 mean that the value of x could be -4, or -3, or -2, etc, etc?
It might be best to picture the Number Line to help you visualize what the inequality means. Using the Number Line figure below, can you tell us the answer to your question?

1668202881384.png


https://d138zd1ktt9iqe.cloudfront.n...ber-line-negative-and-positive-1634275662.png
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203, Lnewqban, mcastillo356 and 1 other person
Sometimes Bitesize oversimplifies things, particularly at the very beginning of KS3. A more complete definition would be
matthewphilip said:
Inequalities are the relationships between two expressions which can have values that are not necessarily equal to one another. The symbols used for inequalities are <, >, ≤, ≥ and ≠.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
matthewphilip said:
7>x reads as '7 is greater than x' (or 'x is less than 7', reading from right to left).

x≤−4 reads as 'x is less than or equal to -4' (or '-4 is greater than or equal to x', reading from right to left)."

I have two questions regards the above.
Are 7 and x the two expressions in the first example?
Yes.
matthewphilip said:
Are x and -4 the two expressions in the second example?
Yes.
matthewphilip said:
And, why are there greater than or EQUAL to / less than or EQUAL to signs involved if this is about expressions which are NOT EQUAL to one another?
The reference stated the definition carelessly. They should have that the inequality symbols are ##\lt## and ##\gt##. Where the equal bar is included, as in ##\le## and ##\ge##, equality is also allowed.
matthewphilip said:
Regards the second example, for example (x is less than or equal to -4) ; what if x is -4? Then it's equal to -4 and not an 'inequality', yes/no?
Yes, if x=-4. But ##\le## allows more than that in one symbol.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203 and Lnewqban
FactChecker said:
The reference stated the definition carelessly. They should have that the inequality symbols are ##\lt## and ##\gt##. Where the equal bar is included, as in ##\le## and ##\ge##, equality is also allowed.
Following @FactChecker's post I'll add even more to my definition:

Inequalities are the relationships between two expressions which can have values that are not necessarily equal to one another. The symbols normally used for inequalities are ## \lt, \gt, \le, \mathrm{and} \ge ##; we sometimes also consider ## \ne ## to be an inequality symbol. We call ## \lt ## and ## \gt ## (and also ## \ne ## if we are using it) strict inequalities, and although it is correct to read ## x \lt 4 ## as "x is less than 4" we can also read it as "x is strictly less than 4". We read ## x \ne 4 ## as "x is not equal to 4".

You can see why Bitesize simplified it.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203 and FactChecker
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
  • #10
Those signs are important in negations: If we know that NOT (x<4) then we have (x≥4).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: paulb203
  • #11
pbuk said:
We call ## \le ## and ## \ge ## (and also ## \ne ## if we are using it) strict inequalities
You made a typo here. It is < and > that are strict inequalities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: pbuk
  • #12
matthewphilip said:
Thanks, PeroK. To check I've got the very basics before I ask about your answer; does x is less than or equal to -4 mean that the value of x could be -4, or -3, or -2, etc, etc?
Note that ##-3 > -4##. If we take ##x## to be an integer, then ##x \le -4## means ##x## could be ##-4, -5, -6 \dots##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jbriggs444 and paulb203
  • #13
DrClaude said:
You made a typo here. It is < and > that are strict inequalities.
Thanks, corrected.
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 68 ·
3
Replies
68
Views
12K