What Are Black Bodies & Why Are Stars Considered Them?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eyad-996
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Black body Body
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of black bodies, particularly in relation to stars and their properties. Participants explore definitions, characteristics, and the implications of black body radiation, as well as the relationship between absorption and emission of radiation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants define a black body as an object with zero albedo that absorbs all incoming radiation and reflects none, while noting that stars are not perfect black bodies but behave similarly enough for practical purposes.
  • There is a question about whether the radiation emitted by black bodies is within the visible spectrum, with some arguing that black bodies can emit visible radiation, as seen with stars.
  • A distinction is made between reflection and radiation, with an analogy provided to clarify that reflected radiation retains its original properties, while absorbed and re-emitted radiation does not.
  • Wien's Displacement Law is mentioned as a method to determine the peak of an emission spectrum from a black body, although there is a note about missing units for the constant involved.
  • One participant suggests that a black body can emit radiation without needing to absorb it first, as long as it has a temperature above absolute zero.
  • There is a discussion about the process of thermalization within a black body, where atoms absorb energy and later emit it based on their thermal energy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying degrees of understanding and interpretation of black bodies and their properties, with some agreeing that stars are good approximations of black bodies, while others raise questions about the specifics of absorption and emission processes. The discussion remains unresolved on certain technical points and definitions.

Contextual Notes

Some claims about the relationship between absorption and emission are not fully explored, and there are unresolved questions about the implications of the definitions provided. The discussion also touches on the nuances of how black bodies operate under different conditions.

eyad-996
Messages
18
Reaction score
2
I'm having the hardest time understanding Black bodies. I have a lot of questions about them so I can't write all of them, instead I'll just start with : Why are stars considered black bodies?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
eyad-996 said:
I'm having the hardest time understanding Black bodies. I have a lot of questions about them so I can't write all of them, instead I'll just start with : Why are stars considered black bodies?

Tell us what you know about black bodies...
 
A black body is an object with zero albedo - that is an object that absorbs all incoming radiation and reflects none of it back. That doesn't mean they will be black because black bodies produce their own radiation according with the black body radiation formula which depends on the temperature of the black body. A star really isn't a perfect black body but it's behavior is close enough to a black body that the black body formulae will describe it to a reasonably high accuracy.
 
dauto said:
That doesn't mean they will be black because black bodies produce their own radiation according with the black body radiation formula which depends on the temperature of the black body.

So the radiation they emit is not within the visible spectrum, correct?

On whatis.techtarget.com
They defined a Black body as " a theoretically ideal radiator and absorber ".
Doesn't that contradict with what you said about black bodies not reflecting any radiation back?

In other words, how does reflection differ from radiation?
 
eyad-996 said:
So the radiation they emit is not within the visible spectrum, correct?

On whatis.techtarget.com
They defined a Black body as " a theoretically ideal radiator and absorber ".
Doesn't that contradict with what you said about black bodies not reflecting any radiation back?

In other words, how does reflection differ from radiation?

The distribution of the radiation they emit depends on their temperature. From your reading, what is the equation for the emission spectra from a black body?
 
eyad-996 said:
So the radiation they emit is not within the visible spectrum, correct?

On whatis.techtarget.com
They defined a Black body as " a theoretically ideal radiator and absorber ".
Doesn't that contradict with what you said about black bodies not reflecting any radiation back?

In other words, how does reflection differ from radiation?

Black bodies do emit visible radiation. That's where the sun's visible light come from.

That page is saying the same thing I said. An ideal absorber absorbs all radiation reflecting none.

If you're a american football fun, you know the difference between reflection and radiation. It the quarterback throughs the ball to a receiver and the receiver reflects it, we have an incomplete. If the receiver absorbs it and emits it again, we have a fumble. Physically, reflected radiation preserve properties such as its wavelength while absorbed and re-emitted radiation will have properties dictated by the emitting body temperature.
 
Last edited:
berkeman said:
From your reading, what is the equation for the emission spectra from a black body?

To determine the peak of an emission spectrum (I think I phrased that right!) You use Wien's Displacement Law :
Peak λ * T = b
where T is the absolute temperature of the Black body, and b is around 2.9*10^-3
 
eyad-996 said:
To determine the peak of an emission spectrum (I think I phrased that right!) You use Wien's Displacement Law :
Peak λ * T = b
where T is the absolute temperature of the Black body, and b is around 2.9*10^-3

Correct, except for the missing units for the constant b.
 
So let me get this straight, a Black body absorbs the radiation of a certain spectrum and then re-emits it in a different spectrum with a different peak wavelength?
 
  • #10
I keep picturing a star every time I talk about Black bodies, how wrong is that?
 
  • #11
Maybe the missing part (in the sense that it was not pointed out yet) is that the black body's emission is not conditioned by absorption. You don't need absorption in order to have emission.
As long as the BB has a temperature above zero it will emit the BB spectrum. Of course, this will make the body to cool down and the spectrum will change accordingly. Unless there is an internal source of energy which will compensate for the energy lost by radiation.
For a star I suppose the absorption is not very important in the general energy balance.
 
  • #12
eyad-996 said:
So let me get this straight, a Black body absorbs the radiation of a certain spectrum and then re-emits it in a different spectrum with a different peak wavelength?

Yes, that's right.
 
  • #13
eyad-996 said:
I keep picturing a star every time I talk about Black bodies, how wrong is that?

Not too wrong. Stars are fairly good black bodies.
 
  • #14
dauto said:
Yes, that's right.

Well then where/when did this 'conversion' happen?
 
  • #15
eyad-996 said:
Well then where/when did this 'conversion' happen?

It happens in the black body itself. Atoms absorb the energy, spread it around through collisions (a process also known as thermalization), and the atoms emit the energy again at a latter time according with their own average thermal energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
811
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 87 ·
3
Replies
87
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K