What are Different Types of Vector Normalization?

  • Thread starter Thread starter juliette sekx
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the need to specify types of vector normalization, particularly distinguishing between max-normalization and Euclidean normalization. One participant seeks terminology to succinctly describe the process of dividing each element by the largest element in the vector. It is clarified that simply stating normalization to a range of 0 to 1 does not inherently imply max-normalization. Additionally, the importance of addressing negative components in normalization is highlighted, as failing to do so could compromise the norm property. Clear terminology is essential for effective communication in mathematical contexts.
juliette sekx
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
I want to write that I'm normalizing a vector, but I need to specify what TYPE of normalization I'm doing.

I want to say that I'm dividing each element by the largest element in the vector, rather than something else like dividing all elements by the Euclidean length of the vector or something like that.

Is there a word for these two types of normalization, so that I don't need to explain what I'm doing in words ?? Like for ex. "max-normalization" and "Euclidean Normalization" ??

If I said that I'm normalizing the elements to lie between 0 and 1, would it be obvious that I'm dividing each element by the largest element in the vector ??

THank you.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
juliette sekx said:
I want to write that I'm normalizing a vector, but I need to specify what TYPE of normalization I'm doing.

I want to say that I'm dividing each element by the largest element in the vector, rather than something else like dividing all elements by the Euclidean length of the vector or something like that.
So you use the maximum norm ...
Is there a word for these two types of normalization, so that I don't need to explain what I'm doing in words ?? Like for ex. "max-normalization" and "Euclidean Normalization" ??
... and the Euclidean norm.
If I said that I'm normalizing the elements to lie between 0 and 1, would it be obvious that I'm dividing each element by the largest element in the vector ??
No. This would not be the only possibility.
THank you.
Also you have to specify how you deal with negative components. You might lose the norm property if you don't apply absolute values first.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
641
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K