MHB What Are Key Strategies for Solving Discrete Math Graph Theory Problems?

Physics news on Phys.org
First, I'd like to point out http://www.mathhelpboards.com/misc.php?do=vsarules #8: "Do not ask more than two questions in a post" and rule #11: "Show some effort". I recommend starting separate threads for problems 2–5 and describing what you have done and/or what difficulty you are having.

I'll give some hints about problem 1. For A, answer the following questions.

  1. How many (unordered) pairs of vertices does a graph with $n$ vertices have? Let's denote this number by $C(n)$.
  2. If a graph $G$ has $e$ edges, how many edges does the complement of $G$ have? Make sure you know what a graph complement is. The answer should use $C(n)$.
  3. What can be said about the number of edges in isomorphic graphs?
  4. Suppose a self-complementary graph with $n$ vertices has $e$ edges. Write an equation on $e$ using the definition of a self-complementary graph and points 2 and 3 above.

For B, draw a graph connecting each pair of vertices using either solid or dashed line. The number of edges of each type should be what you found in point A. The solid graph should be isomorphic to the dashed one. Put 4 vertices in the corners of a square. Make it so that rotating the picture by 90 degrees maps solid edges into dashed ones and vice versa. For 5 vertices, prove that a regular pentagon is self-complementary (construct an explicit bijection between vertices and check that it is an isomorphism).

For C, use the fact that $C(n)$ is an integer.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top