What Are Non-Crossing Partitions and How Are They Defined?

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alyafey22
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    partitions
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of non-crossing partitions, exploring both verbal and mathematical descriptions. Participants examine the nature of these partitions, their visualization, and the mathematical concepts associated with them, such as Bell numbers and Catalan numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant defines a partition of a set as a collection of non-empty disjoint subsets whose union covers the set, mentioning the use of Bell numbers for counting them.
  • Another participant describes non-crossing partitions, explaining that they are defined such that no two blocks cross each other, providing an example of the arrangement of elements.
  • A participant expresses surprise that the existing explanation is the only one available, suggesting that a more formal mathematical definition should exist.
  • Another participant questions the adequacy of the quoted definition, seeking clarification on whether it is sufficient.
  • A later reply indicates a shift in understanding, acknowledging that the general idea of non-crossing partitions has been grasped.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the sufficiency of the verbal definition of non-crossing partitions, indicating that there is no consensus on whether the existing explanations are adequate.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the need for a more rigorous mathematical definition, suggesting that the current explanations may lack depth or clarity.

alyafey22
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,556
Reaction score
2
Define a partition of a set $S$ as a collection of non-empty disjoint subsets $\in S$ whose union covers $S$. The number of them is defined using the Bell numbers.

Can we define ''Non-crossing'' partitions in words . I have seen the visualization of these partitions and the number of them is calculated using the Catalan's numbers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the wiki, it says that a noncrossing partition
is a partition in which no two blocks "cross" each other, i.e., if a and b belong to one block and x and y to another, they are not arranged in the order a x b y. If one draws an arch based at a and b, and another arch based at x and y, then the two arches cross each other if the order is a x b y but not if it is a x y b or a b x y. In the latter two orders the partition { { a, b }, { x, y } } is noncrossing.
There's a nice picture illustrating noncrossing partitions.
 
Ackbach said:
In the wiki, it says that a noncrossing partition There's a nice picture illustrating noncrossing partitions.

Yes, I already saw this . But I am surprised to know that this is the only explanation! I mean it should have a mathematical definition '' can be described by words '' .
 
Is the part I quoted not in words? Is it an adequate definition? These are not rhetorical questions, but genuine.
 
Ackbach said:
Is the part I quoted not in words? Is it an adequate definition? These are not rhetorical questions, but genuine.

I actually meant something else .But now I got the general idea , thanks .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K