Undergrad What are some good arguments against mathematics being discovered?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the philosophical debate regarding whether mathematics is discovered or invented. Participants argue that while mathematicians create methods and techniques, many mathematical truths, such as the Pythagorean theorem, are discovered through proofs. The conversation highlights the complexity of this topic, comparing it to the unquestionable nature of the sun rising in the east. The thread was ultimately closed due to the difficulty of reaching a consensus on this philosophical issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical concepts such as the Pythagorean theorem
  • Familiarity with philosophical debates surrounding invention vs. discovery
  • Knowledge of topology and its applications
  • Awareness of historical figures in mathematics, such as G. H. Hardy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the philosophical implications of mathematics as discussed in G. H. Hardy's works
  • Explore the relationship between mathematics and cryptography
  • Investigate the role of topology in modern mathematics and its practical applications
  • Watch NOVA's "The Great Math Mystery" for insights into the nature of mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, mathematicians, educators, and anyone interested in the foundational questions of mathematics and its applications in various fields.

murshid_islam
Messages
468
Reaction score
21
What are some good arguments against mathematics being discovered (or for it being invented)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
IMO, it's a mixture. On one hand, mathematicians invent methods and techniques that humans can understand. Also, many techniques are invented to apply mathematics in other subjects such as physics, astronomy, etc. On the other hand, many truths are discovered when their proofs are derived.
 
Seeing as how mathematics has already been discovered, this question is counterfactual. Compare with "What are some good arguments against the sun having risen in the east this morning?" - there aren't any.

That makes it hard to conduct a sensible discussion within the forum rules so this thread is closed. (As with any thread closure, we can reopen for further comments if someone has more to say - PM any mentor to ask).

@murshid_islam you might want to read https://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/~v1ranick/papers/wigner.pdf
 
In reply, this is a debate that will never be answered. We develop math from patterns we see and we develop math for some abstract problem we created. Much of math is discovered as in the pythagorean theorem but there are areas of math like topology that worlds unto themselves and later become tools in more practical matters.

Feynman had a talk (Cornell Messenger Lectures) about needing math for a 3D problem and the mathematician in his story well I have just the answer an N dimensional mathematics. Feynman would say no no no, I just want it for 3D use. Later he sheepishly goes back to the mathematician and asks for the N dimensional math.



Prof GH Hardy was proud that his work on pure mathematics had no bearing on anything military or anything practical until someone realized it could help in cryptography. He detested war.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._H._Hardy

Here is a whole reddit thread on the debate:



and a BBC program on it:

https://www.sciencefocus.com/science/was-maths-invented-or-discovered

As well as NOVA's The Great Math Mystery

 
  • Like
Likes murshid_islam

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
558
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K