What are the allowed energies for a quantum harmonic oscillator?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Moham1287
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energies Sho
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The allowed energies for a quantum harmonic oscillator are defined by the equation E(n) = (n + 1/2)ħω, where n is the vibrational quantum number and ħ is the reduced Planck's constant. The energies are quantized as 0, hf, 2hf, etc., but the ground state energy is not zero due to the non-zero constant term (1/2)ħω. This discrepancy arises because the Hamiltonians describing the system differ only by a constant, which does not affect the physical predictions. Historical context includes Einstein's contributions to understanding the non-zero ground state energy of the harmonic oscillator.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics fundamentals
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation
  • Knowledge of Planck's postulate and quantum energy quantization
  • Basic concepts of Hamiltonian mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Schrödinger equation for the quantum harmonic oscillator
  • Explore the implications of zero-point energy in quantum systems
  • Read Einstein's papers on the quantum harmonic oscillator and ground state energy
  • Investigate the relationship between classical and quantum mechanics in harmonic oscillators
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists interested in quantum systems, and educators seeking to clarify concepts related to the quantum harmonic oscillator.

Moham1287
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I was just looking through my notes from my first year of my degree, and I couldn't find a missing bit. I know that Planck's postulate states that the allowed energies of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator are 0, hf, 2hf etc and that by the Schroedinger equation, you get E(n)=(n+1/2) hbar omega, but I can't explain why each of these give different answers. A quick google didn't bring up anything not password protected, and I don't have my textbooks with me at the moment. Anything to clear this up would be much appreciated!
Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Moham1287 said:
I know that Planck's postulate states that the allowed energies of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator are 0, hf, 2hf etc

Planck was dealing with electromagnetic radiation, not the simple harmonic oscillator (mass on a spring and similar things).
 
Moham1287 said:
...the allowed energies of a quantum simple harmonic oscillator are 0, hf, 2hf etc and that by the Schroedinger equation, you get E(n)=(n+1/2) hbar omega, but I can't explain why each of these give different answers...

\hbar\omega=hf

...the remaining difference is just a constant (0.5\hbar\omega) which can be ignored.
 
I.e., the Hamiltonians

<br /> H=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{kx^2}{2}<br />

and

<br /> H&#039;=\frac{p^2}{2m}+\frac{kx^2}{2}-\hbar\sqrt{\frac{k}{4m}}<br />

describe the same physics since they differ only by a constant... and furthermore, it should be obvious that they are equal in the classical limit.
 
There's actually a little known paper by Einstein, where he first figures out that the Harmonic Oscillator needs a non-zero ground state energy, and he sticks in the 0.5 \hbar \omega by hand. Can't recall or pull up the citation. Anyone know what I'm talking about.
 
According to Schrödinger equation,the particle cannot have zero energy.Because the solutions are (v+1/2)hf,v is vibrational quantum number.If v happens to be -1,then energy is -ve,considering zero potential the KE is -ve and so is momentum.This is not in correspondance with uncertainity principle.
 
jtbell is correct also,I am sorry to misunderstand your question.Planck was dealing with the blackbody radiations and schrodnger with quantum mechanical harmonic oscillator.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K