What are the Eigenvalues and Eigenkets of a Spin-1/2 System in a Magnetic Field?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the eigenvalues and eigenkets of a spin-1/2 system subjected to magnetic fields along the z and x directions. The Hamiltonian is defined as H = H0 + V, where H0 = -μzBz and V = -μxBx. The eigenvalues of H0 are derived from the Pauli spin operator σz, yielding ε0 and -ε0. The expression for V is correctly formulated as V = (-qBxħ/4mc)(σ+ + σ-), but participants encounter challenges in evaluating the eigenvalues of H, suggesting the need for matrix representation of the Hamiltonian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts, particularly spin-1/2 systems.
  • Familiarity with Pauli spin matrices and their properties.
  • Knowledge of Hamiltonians in quantum mechanics.
  • Ability to manipulate eigenvalue equations and linear combinations of quantum states.
NEXT STEPS
  • Learn about the matrix representation of Pauli matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics.
  • Study the process of solving eigenvalue problems in quantum systems.
  • Explore the concept of quantum state normalization and its significance in quantum mechanics.
  • Investigate alternative methods for deriving eigenstates in quantum systems, such as using complete bases.
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in quantum mechanics, particularly those studying spin systems and their behavior in magnetic fields, will benefit from this discussion.

phys-student
Messages
32
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Consider a spin system with noninteracting spin 1/2 particles. The magnetic moment of the system is written as:
μ = (ħq/2mc)σ
Where σ = (σx, σy, σz) is the Pauli spin operator of the particle. A magnetic field of strength Bz is applied along the z direction and a second field Bx is applied along the x direction. The Hamiltonian of the particles is:
H = H0 + V
H0 = -μzBz
V = -μxBx
a) Find the eigenvalues and eigenkets of H0
b) Express V in terms of σ+ and σ-
c) Find the eigenvalues and eigenkets of H

Homework Equations


σ+ = σx + iσy
σ- = σx - iσy
σ+ = |+><-|
σ- = |-><+|
σz|+> = 1|+>
σz|-> = -1|->

The Attempt at a Solution


For part a) I'm pretty sure I did it right
H0 = (-qBzħ/2mc)σz or H0 = ε0σz if ε0 = -qBzħ/2mc.
The operators H0 and σz commute so they have the same eigenkets |+> and |->
Using the expression for H0 and the eigenvalue equations for σz given above the eigenkets of H0 are ε0 and -ε0.
Part b I'm not so sure. I wrote the expression for V in the same way that I did for H0:
V = (-qBxħ/2mc)σx
Then using equations given above I worked out that σx = (σ+ + σ-)/2, so I subbed that into the the expression to get:
V = (-qBxħ/4mc)(σ+ + σ-)
When I try to do part c I start running into problems and I think it is because I did something in part a or b wrong. Can anyone tell me if I've made any mistakes in part a or b?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phys-student said:
V = (-qBxħ/4mc)(σ+ + σ-)
That looks right.
phys-student said:
I start running into problems
What are your problems?
 
When I try to find the eigenvalues of H I get the expression:

(-ε0σz - (qBxħ/4mc)(σ+ + σ-))|+> = ε|+>

and I don't know how to evaluate it properly. I tried plugging these in: σ+ = |+><-|, σ- = |-><+| but I have no idea what to do after that. Are you supposed to expand it so that you're taking the eigenvalue of the first term and the eigenvalues of the second term?
 
Write the matrix form of ##H## using the knowledge of the matrix form of Pauli matrices. Then solve the eigenvalue problem in resulting matrix equation.
 
I'm not very familiar with the matrix form of Pauli matrices, it wasn't covered in this course... Do you know of a source I can read that would help?
 
There is an alternative route to the solution. You know that the |+> and |-> kets for a complete basis, therefore the eigenstates of H can be written as a|+> + b|->. Try solving H (a|+> + b|->) = E (a|+> + b|->) for a and b (along with proper normalization).
 
Pauli matrices are related to the spin matrices of spin 1/2 particles. But if you are not yet familiar with those matrices, DrClaude's suggestion above will also do the job.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
705
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K