MHB What Are the Expectations for Graduate Students?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graduate
Click For Summary
Graduate students are expected to engage deeply with proofs, often needing to demonstrate understanding of major theorems from textbooks. Unlike undergraduate studies that focus more on computational problems, graduate-level assignments prioritize proving concepts, which can be challenging. Some students find this shift difficult initially but eventually appreciate the rigor and logic involved in formal proofs. Mastery of proof techniques is often necessary for qualifying exams and progression in graduate programs. Overall, adapting to this expectation is seen as crucial for success in advanced mathematics.
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Hi everyone, :)

Stuck in a terribly difficult assignment I came to think of the following. What is the expectancy level from a grad student? I mean in undergraduate assignments we were given more often computational type questions, if we are given proofs they aren't so difficult. Then in grad level I found that it's the other way around. Almost always we have to prove things. Some are in fact equivalent to theorems in the recommended textbooks. Is it that the perfect grad student need to be able to prove every theorem in the book? What is your idea about this? :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sudharaka said:
Hi everyone, :)

Stuck in a terribly difficult assignment I came to think of the following. What is the expectancy level from a grad student? I mean in undergraduate assignments we were given more often computational type questions, if we are given proofs they aren't so difficult. Then in grad level I found that it's the other way around. Almost always we have to prove things. Some are in fact equivalent to theorems in the recommended textbooks. Is it that the perfect grad student need to be able to prove every theorem in the book? What is your idea about this? :)

I original was doing pure math in grad school until I realized I prefer applied. If have you qualifying or similar tests in your country, then yes you will be expected to prove major theorems in order to progress to candicacy or get your MS. At my school, for example, some of the old qualifiers would have prove the orbit stabilizer theorem on it as a question as well as Cauchy Goursat and some other big theorems. Those type proofs can be about 3 pages long.

My idea is to me it sounds about right.
 
Two years ago , I used to hate proofs. In the calculus book we were asked to prove simple results but I didn't like solving these types of questions. I think the reason is that I didn't get used to doing these stuff and I lacked the ability to analyze and construct formal proofs. After taking some courses on proofs , they are now may favorite questions. When you see the wording of a theorem in real or complex analysis you realize it is written with care.It has to follow the laws of logic .I believe that proofs are just like computational problems you have to get used to them and prove as many theorems as you can.
 
This is my second year in college, and I changed my major to electrical engineering at the start of my second year. I'm taking Calc 1, and I know that I'm going to fail the course. I think there are several reasons for this. I hadn't touched math in an entire year (finished pre-calc 2 in HS), and I heard Calc 1 was the easiest math course, so I decided that taking the class without outside help (tutors or office hours) was enough. I tried really hard and spent hours learning, studying, and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
9K