MHB What Are the Probabilities of Matching Gloves in a Random Distribution?

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the probabilities of matching gloves from six pairs distributed randomly among six people. Key probabilities are derived using derangements, with the probability of no matches being 265/720, and the probability of everyone having a matching pair being 1/720. For exactly one match, the probability is calculated as 11/30, while the probability of at least two matches is found to be 191/720. Participants clarify terminology, noting that "gant" likely refers to "glove." The conversation emphasizes combinatorial methods to solve the problem.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hey again! (Wasntme)

We have $6$ pairs of gants,all of them have a different colour.
We share the $6$ right gants randomly to $6$ people,then we share the $6$ left gants randomly to the same people.
Find the possibility:
  • Nobody has a pair of the same colour
  • Everybody has a pair of the same colour
  • Only one gets a pair of the same colour
  • at least $2$ get a pair of the same colour
That's what I have tried (Blush):Let $D_n=|\{ \sigma \in S_n: \sigma(i) \neq i \forall i \in [n]\}|$

  • $6! \cdot D_6$
  • $6!$
  • $6! \cdot 5!$
  • $6!-D_2$

Could you tell me if it is right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
evinda said:
Hey again! (Wasntme)

We have $6$ pairs of gants,all of them have a different colour.
We share the $6$ right gants randomly to $6$ people,then we share the $6$ left gants randomly to the same people.
Find the possibility:
  • Nobody has a pair of the same colour
  • Everybody has a pair of the same colour
  • Only one gets a pair of the same colour
  • at least $2$ get a pair of the same colour

Hey! (Mmm)

Hmm. What do you mean by "possibility"?
Do you mean the number of possibilities?
Or do you mean the probability? (Wondering)

And what is a "gant"? (Thinking)
That's what I have tried (Blush):Let $D_n=|\{ \sigma \in S_n: \sigma(i) \neq i \forall i \in [n]\}|$

Could you tell me if it is right?

  • $6! \cdot D_6$
  • $6!$

Right and right! (Sun)

  • $6! \cdot 5!$

Hmm... suppose the first person gets a pair.
How many possibilities to divide the remaining gants? (Thinking)
  • $6!-D_2$

Hmm... $D_2$ is the number of possibilities that 2 gants are divided differently... which is 1 possibility.
I don't think that will work! (Doh)
 
Hello, evinda!

We have 6 pairs of gants, each pair a different color.
We share the 6 right gants randomly to 6 people,
then we share the 6 left gants randomly to the same people.

Find the probability that:
(a) Nobody has a pair of the same color.
(b) Everyone has pair of the same color.
(c) Exactly one gets a pair of the same color.
(d) At least two get a pair of the same color.
A derangement is an distribution
in which no one has a matching pair.

Let d(n) = number of derangements of n objects.

There are: 6! = 720 possible outcomes.

(a) P(\text{No matches}) \:=\:\frac{d(6)}{6!} \:=\:\frac{265}{720} \:=\:\frac{53}{144}(b) There is one way in which there are 6 matches.
P(\text{6 matches}) \:=\:\frac{1}{720}(c) There are 6 choices for the person with the match.
The other 5 gants must be deranged.
P(\text{1 match}) \:=\;\frac{6\cdot d(5)}{6!} \:=\:\frac{6\cdot 44}{720} \:=\:\frac{11}{30}(d) The opposite of "at least two" is "0 or 1".
We already know: P(0) =\tfrac{265}{720},\;P(1) = \tfrac{264}{720}
Hence: P(\text{0 or 1}) \:=\:\tfrac{265}{720}+\tfrac{264}{720} \:=\:\tfrac{529}{720}
Therefore: .P(\text{2 or more}) \:=\:1 - \frac{529}{720} \:=\:\frac{191}{720}
 
Also I think "gant" means "glove" here. Probably translation error :p
 
Hello, I'm joining this forum to ask two questions which have nagged me for some time. They both are presumed obvious, yet don't make sense to me. Nobody will explain their positions, which is...uh...aka science. I also have a thread for the other question. But this one involves probability, known as the Monty Hall Problem. Please see any number of YouTube videos on this for an explanation, I'll leave it to them to explain it. I question the predicate of all those who answer this...
There is a nice little variation of the problem. The host says, after you have chosen the door, that you can change your guess, but to sweeten the deal, he says you can choose the two other doors, if you wish. This proposition is a no brainer, however before you are quick enough to accept it, the host opens one of the two doors and it is empty. In this version you really want to change your pick, but at the same time ask yourself is the host impartial and does that change anything. The host...
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
46
Views
13K
3
Replies
100
Views
11K
Replies
46
Views
8K