What are the proofs for various equations related to Maxwell's equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chris L T521
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the proofs of equations derived from Maxwell's equations, specifically in a charge-free and current-free region. The key equations addressed include the curl of the electric field $\nabla\times (\nabla\times \mathbf{E}) = -\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2}$ and the curl of the magnetic field $\nabla\times (\nabla\times \mathbf{H}) = -\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{H}}{\partial t^2}$. Additionally, the wave equations for the electric and magnetic fields are established as $\nabla^2\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2}$ and $\nabla^2\mathbf{H} = \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{H}}{\partial t^2}$. These results are crucial for understanding electromagnetic wave propagation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically curl and divergence.
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations in electromagnetism.
  • Knowledge of wave equations and their derivations.
  • Basic understanding of the speed of light constant, $c$.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of wave equations from Maxwell's equations.
  • Learn about the physical significance of curl and divergence in electromagnetic fields.
  • Explore applications of Maxwell's equations in modern physics.
  • Investigate the implications of electromagnetic wave propagation in various media.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and applied mathematics who seek a deeper understanding of electromagnetic theory and wave phenomena.

Chris L T521
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
913
Reaction score
0
Thanks again to those who participated in last week's POTW! Here's this week's problem!

-----

Background Info: Maxwell's equations relating the electric field $\mathbf{E}$ and magnetic field $\mathbf{H}$ as they vary with time in a region containing no charge and no current can be stated as follows:

\[\begin{array}{ccc} \begin{aligned}\mathrm{div}\,\mathbf{E} &= 0 \\ \mathrm{curl}\,\mathbf{E} &= -\frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial \mathbf{H}}{\partial t} \end{aligned} & & \begin{aligned}\mathrm{div}\,\mathbf{H} &= 0 \\ \mathrm{curl}\,\mathbf{H} &= \frac{1}{c}\frac{\partial\mathbf{E}}{\partial t}\end{aligned}\end{array}\]

where $c$ is the speed of light.

Problem: Use the above equations to prove the following:

(a) $\displaystyle \nabla\times (\nabla\times \mathbf{E}) = -\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2}$

(b) $\displaystyle \nabla\times (\nabla\times \mathbf{H}) = -\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{H}}{\partial t^2}$

(c) $\displaystyle\nabla^2\mathbf{E} = \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2}$

(d) $\displaystyle\nabla^2\mathbf{H} = \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2 \mathbf{H}}{\partial t^2}$

-----

Note: $\nabla \times\mathbf{F}$ and $\nabla\cdot\mathbf{F}$ also denotes the curl and divergence of a vector field $\mathbf{F}$ respectively.

Hint:
For (c) & (d), the indentity $\mathrm{curl}\,(\mathrm{curl}\,(\mathbf{F}) = \mathrm{grad}\,(\mathrm{div}\,(\mathbf{F})) - \nabla^2\mathbf{F}$ may come in handy.

 
Physics news on Phys.org
This week's problem was correctly answered by Ackbach. You can find his solution below.

For part a): We start with Faraday's Law, invoke Clairaut's Theorem (the electric and magnetic fields will have continuous second-order mixed partial derivatives, because they are physical quantities), and then substitute in Ampere's Law:

\begin{align*}
\nabla \times \vec{E}&=- \frac{1}{c} \, \frac{\partial \vec{H}}{ \partial t}\\
\nabla \times (\nabla \times \vec{E})&= \nabla \times \left(- \frac{1}{c} \, \frac{\partial \vec{H}}{ \partial t} \right)\\
&= - \frac{1}{c} \, \frac{\partial}{ \partial t} \left(\nabla \times \vec{H}\right)\\
&= - \frac{1}{c} \, \frac{\partial}{ \partial t} \left( \frac{1}{c} \frac{ \partial \vec{E}}{ \partial t} \right)\\
&= - \frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{ \partial^{2} \vec{E}}{ \partial t^{2}}.
\end{align*}

Part b) is exactly analogous with part a), except that you start with Ampere's Law and substitute in Faraday's Law.

For part c): We start with the result of part a), and note the vector identity $\nabla \times (\nabla \times \vec{E})= \nabla( \nabla \cdot \vec{E})- \nabla^{2} \vec{E}$. The first term on the RHS vanishes because of Gauss's Law for Electric Fields, and you are left with
$$-\nabla^{2} \vec{E}=- \frac{1}{c^{2}} \frac{ \partial^{2} \vec{E}}{ \partial t^{2}},$$
from which the result follows.

Part d), again, is exactly analogous to part c), except that we will need to invoke Gauss's Law for Magnetic Fields instead.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
719
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
785
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
768
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
852
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K