What are the recent advancements in quantum gravity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The recent advancements in quantum gravity include significant concepts such as holographic duality, causal sets, causal dynamical triangulation, and asymptotic safety. Notably, the "No Hair Theorem" by Werner Israel has revolutionized black hole physics, demonstrating that only mass and spin are necessary to describe black holes. This discussion emphasizes the importance of foundational papers in string theory and quantum gravity, providing a roadmap for those pursuing research in this challenging yet fascinating field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics and general relativity
  • Familiarity with string theory concepts
  • Knowledge of black hole physics, particularly the No Hair Theorem
  • Basic mathematical skills relevant to theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Read foundational papers on string theory, such as "String Theory" and "Quantum Gravity"
  • Explore causal sets and causal dynamical triangulation methodologies
  • Investigate the implications of the Swampland conjecture in quantum gravity
  • Study the relationship between quantum entanglement and classical spacetime emergence
USEFUL FOR

The discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in physics, and researchers interested in the latest developments in quantum gravity and black hole physics.

ProtonNeutron
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I am currently doing my masters in theoretical physics and I would like for my phd to be something quantum gravity oriented. However it seems hard to find what's "hot" in the field those past few years and I only know the basics of these topics (though I believe this can be improved). What are some of the relatively revent advances? Is getting into the field really worth it (asking this from a research perspective)? And if it is how do I approach this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Everyone has his own opinion on the matter. One of the most generaly accepted development is probably holographic duality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ProtonNeutron and atyy
ProtonNeutron said:
whats "hot"
That usually means that all the easy stuff has already been done.

From an article about Werner Israel (one of my undergrad professors):

Israel’s proof became known as the “No Hair Theorem of Black Holes, with “hair” being physicists’ slang for mathematical complications. It shows only two numbers are needed to describe any black hole: its mass and its spin.“

It surprised everybody,” said Israel. “Even Stephen was surprised and very, very impressed by that paper.”

He said Hawking in one of his popular books later credited Israel with having “revolutionized black-hole physics.”

“I think he was being a little too kind,” said Israel.

He called his discovery a mixture of luck and timing. It was early on in the physicists’ examination of black holes and not many were interested.

“Back then very few people even believed in them, even Einstein didn’t believe,” said Israel. “Black holes were just too exciting.”

“So it was very good to get in at the beginning.” he said. “It was actually very easy then to make great discoveries.”
 
  • Like
  • Love
Likes   Reactions: diogenesNY, AndreasC, pinball1970 and 4 others
Keith_McClary said:
That usually means that all the easy stuff has already been done.
Yeah that's obviously fair to say. However I still find the subject immensly interesting and compelling. I would like to examine some approaches like causal sets, causal dynamical triangulation or asymptotic safety as well as improve my general knowledge on the subject and its associated mathematics. I know this will surely be an extremely hard journey but I'm willing to take it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: curious_mind and ProtonNeutron
Maybe the way classical spacetime emerges from quantum entanglement using tensor networks? See e.g. "It from bit", Van Raamsdonk, Preskil, etc.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
15K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K