What are the speeds of two Jupiter sized planets when they collide?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the speeds of two Jupiter-sized planets colliding after being released from rest 1.0 x 10^11 m apart. Key points include the need to use the distance between their centers for gravitational calculations and that the potential energy of the system changes into kinetic energy as they collide. The gravitational potential energy is calculated using the formula Ug = -Gm1m2/r, and the kinetic energy is derived from the total energy of both planets. Clarifications were sought regarding the inclusion of radii in calculations and how kinetic energy is distributed between the two planets. Ultimately, the correct speed of the planets upon collision is determined to be approximately 3 x 10^4 m/s.
AbigailG
Messages
12
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Two Jupiter sized planets are released from rest 1.0 X 10^11 m apart. What are their speeds as they crash together?

I think my problem lies in figuring out which radius to use. In an equation like this are the radii of the planets included in the distance between them given? If not, should it be?

Homework Equations


[/B]
Ug = -Gm1m2/r

r (Jupiter) = 6.99 x 10^7 m

m (Jupiter) = 1.9 x 10^27 kg

r (between) = 1.0 X 10^11 m

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Using conservation of energy:

Ei = Ef

Question #1 -- Ei is entirely Ugi...is it 2(Ug) ?

Ef = K + Ugf

Question #2 -- Is there still gravitational potential here? And if so is the radius used equal to twice the radius of Jupiter?

Question #3 -- Is the kinetic energy found for both of the planets or just one?

I need clarification on quite a few points, I apologize...but i feel like once I understand this fully I will be able to work it out myself.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For spherical objects, the distance you want to use for gravitational calculations is the distance between their centers.

Make a drawing showing the initial and final configurations. Indicate the separation between the planet centers for each situation.

The system as a whole (the system being both planets) has gravitational potential energy. You are looking for the change in potential energy between the starting configuration and the ending configuration. That change in potential energy will show up as kinetic energy for the whole system. You need to decide how that energy will be split between the components of the system.
 
AbigailG said:
In an equation like this are the radii of the planets included in the distance between them given? If not, should it be?
Compare the radii of the planets with their initial distance apart. Does it matter? (The distance is usually between their centers.)

AbigailG said:
Question #1 -- Ei is entirely Ugi...is it 2(Ug) ?
The potential energy is of the two-planet system; the formula quoted is all of it.

AbigailG said:
Question #2 -- Is there still gravitational potential here? And if so is the radius used equal to twice the radius of Jupiter?
The distance between them when they crash will equal twice the radius.

AbigailG said:
Question #3 -- Is the kinetic energy found for both of the planets or just one?
Again, the energy is of the system -- so it is the total KE of both.

(gneill beat me to it!)
 
gneill said:
For spherical objects, the distance you want to use for gravitational calculations is the distance between their centers.

Make a drawing showing the initial and final configurations. Indicate the separation between the planet centers for each situation.

The system as a whole (the system being both planets) has gravitational potential energy. You are looking for the change in potential energy between the starting configuration and the ending configuration. That change in potential energy will show up as kinetic energy for the whole system. You need to decide how that energy will be split between the components of the system.

Okay, so I have:

Kf - Ugf = Ugi Where: Ugi = -Gm1m2/r(between) and Ugf = -Gm1m2/2r(Jupiter)

1/2(m1+m2)-Ugf = Ugi

v = sqrt((2(ugi+ugf)/(m1+m2))
= 3 x 10^4 m/s

This is the correct answer. But why did I not have to divide the velocity amongst the two masses? Is it because I divided by the sum of the masses?
 
AbigailG said:
Kf - Ugf = Ugi
That should be a + sign.

AbigailG said:
1/2(m1+m2)-Ugf = Ugi
You left out the v^2 in your KE term. Note that your first term is the total KE of both planets!

AbigailG said:
This is the correct answer. But why did I not have to divide the velocity amongst the two masses? Is it because I divided by the sum of the masses?
You already included that "sharing" when you wrote the total KE earlier.
 
Doc Al said:
That should be a + sign.You left out the v^2 in your KE term. Note that your first term is the total KE of both planets!You already included that "sharing" when you wrote the total KE earlier.

Oops, just a typo. Sorry.

Thank you so much! I appreciate your help.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top