- #1
Phrak
- 4,266
- 7
What are the theorems of Social Science that it deserves to be called a science?
What are the theorems of Social Science that it deserves to be called
- Thread starter Phrak
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Science
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the classification of social sciences as a legitimate scientific discipline, specifically questioning the existence of fundamental theorems or theories within the field. It includes explorations of various branches of social science and the terminology used to describe theoretical constructs.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Conceptual clarification
Main Points Raised
- One participant questions what theorems exist in social science that justify its classification as a science.
- Another participant challenges the understanding of social science, suggesting that it encompasses various branches such as anthropology, economics, and political science, which may contain theories.
- A later reply emphasizes that the term "theorem" may not be appropriate for social sciences, proposing that "hypothesis" might better describe the theoretical constructs in this field.
- Examples of theories, such as Marxist theory, are provided to illustrate the nature of theoretical claims in social sciences, although they note the absence of concise mathematical proofs.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on the terminology and classification of theories in social science, with no consensus on whether the term "theorem" is applicable or what constitutes a fundamental theorem in the field.
Contextual Notes
The discussion highlights the ambiguity in defining theoretical constructs within social sciences and the potential limitations of applying mathematical terminology to these theories.