What are upper and lower bounds and why are they important in mathematics?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter woundedtiger4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bound Upper bound
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concepts of upper and lower bounds in mathematics, specifically focusing on their definitions, properties, and implications in various contexts. Participants explore theoretical aspects, clarify definitions, and engage in conceptual reasoning regarding supremum and infimum.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question why certain numbers are considered lower bounds for specific sets, noting that a lower bound does not need to be an element of the set.
  • There is a discussion about the supremum, with some participants asserting that while 4 is an upper bound for the set {1, 2, 3}, it is not the least upper bound, which is 3.
  • One participant states that any rational number greater than √2 is an upper bound for the set of rational numbers intersecting the interval from -√2 to √2.
  • Another participant clarifies that the greatest lower bound is defined even if a set does not have a minimum, emphasizing that this is true in the real numbers.
  • There is a distinction made between maximum/minimum and supremum/infimum, with some participants discussing the conditions under which these terms apply.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of upper and lower bounds, particularly regarding the existence of least upper bounds and the relationship between bounds and set membership. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views present.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific definitions and assumptions about sets and their elements, which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion also touches on the properties of rational and irrational numbers in relation to bounds.

woundedtiger4
Messages
188
Reaction score
0
At:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Upper_and_lower_bounds

in example it says that

"2 and 5 are both lower bounds for the set { 5, 10, 34, 13934 }, but 8 is not"


Why "2"? as 2 is not in that set.

Also,
at:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremum

in example it says that
"The "Supremum" or "Least Upper Bound" of the set of numbers 1, 2, 3 is 3. Although 4 is also an upper bound, it is not the "least upper bound" and hence not the "Supremum"."


Why? as 4 is not in the set of 1,2,3 but if for a moment I think that as 4>3 so it is the upper bound of the set which contains 1,2,3 then am I correct to say that 3 is the least upper bound ?

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A lower bound of a set A is any number x such that x<a for any ##a\in A##.
So we don't need the number to be in the set (if the element is in the set, then it's called a minimum). A lower bound is just any number smaller than each element in the set.
 
micromass said:
A lower bound of a set A is any number x such that x<a for any ##a\in A##.
So we don't need the number to be in the set (if the element is in the set, then it's called a minimum). A lower bound is just any number smaller than each element in the set.

So 5 is the greatest lower bound.
 
Yes. Anything lower than 5 is also a lower bound.
 
ImageUploadedByPhysics Forums1371326706.331826.jpg


(Copy/pasted from wiki)

Question: as Q doesn't have the least upper bound as 2^1/2 is irrational but the example says that Q has an upper bound, is that upper bound any number greater than 2^1/2 or is it a specific number?
 
micromass said:
Yes. Anything lower than 5 is also a lower bound.

Thank you so much.
 
woundedtiger4 said:
View attachment 59566

(Copy/pasted from wiki)

Question: as Q doesn't have the least upper bound as 2^1/2 is irrational but the example says that Q has an upper bound, is that upper bound any number greater than 2^1/2 or is it a specific number?

Any rational number greater than ##\sqrt{2}## is an upper bound.
 
micromass said:
Any rational number greater than ##\sqrt{2}## is an upper bound.

Once again, thank you very much sir.
 
woundedtiger4 said:
So 5 is the greatest lower bound.
In fact, because 5 is in the set, 5 is the minimum of the set.
(If a set has a minimum (smallest member) then that minimum is the greatest lower bound.) But as long as a set has lower bounds, it has a greatest lower bound whether is has a minimum or not.
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
But as long as a set has lower bounds, it has a greatest lower bound whether is has a minimum or not.

Of course, that is only true in ##\mathbb{R}##.
 
  • #11
woundedtiger4 said:
View attachment 59566

(Copy/pasted from wiki)

Question: as Q doesn't have the least upper bound as 2^1/2 is irrational but the example says that Q has an upper bound, is that upper bound any number greater than 2^1/2 or is it a specific number?
No, it does not say that Q has an upper bound! It says that Q intersect the interval from -\sqrt{2} to \sqrt{2} has upper bounds. 1.5, for example is an upper bound of that set.

(But Q, the set of all rational numbers, does NOT have either upper or lower bounds.)
 
  • #12
What does upper bound, least upper bound (supremum), lower bound, and greatest lower bound (infimum) tells us intutively? It just tells us lower & greater numbers, right?

Is maximum (max) is just an other word for least upper bound (supremum), and similarly minimum (min) is just an other word for greatest lower bound (infimum)?
 
  • #13
woundedtiger4 said:
What does upper bound, least upper bound (supremum), lower bound, and greatest lower bound (infimum) tells us intutively? It just tells us lower & greater numbers, right?

Yes, the upper and lower bound just tells us lower and greater numbers. The greatest lower bound also tells us a lower number, but the best possible one.

Is maximum (max) is just an other word for least upper bound (supremum), and similarly minimum (min) is just an other word for greatest lower bound (infimum)?

Not exactly. A minimum of a set A is an infimum that also belongs to the set.
For example, 1 is an infimum of (1,2], but not a minimum since 1 does not belong to the set. On the other hand, 1 is a minimum of [1,2] and thus also an infimum.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K