What Defines a True Mathematician in Pure Mathematics?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the characteristics and experiences that define a true mathematician in the context of pure mathematics. Participants share personal insights, challenges faced in mathematical education, and the motivations behind pursuing a career in mathematics. The scope includes theoretical aspects, personal reflections, and anecdotal evidence regarding the journey of becoming a mathematician.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions what it means to major in pure mathematics and expresses uncertainty about their ability to succeed in the field.
  • Another participant shares their experience of struggling with proof-based mathematics and feeling overwhelmed by the theoretical aspects of the curriculum.
  • A different perspective emphasizes that pure mathematics focuses on abstract concepts and proof-based learning, suggesting that motivation and hard work are crucial for success.
  • One participant argues that the pursuit of mathematics should be driven by passion rather than a desire for success, suggesting that true mathematicians seek fulfillment in their love for the subject.
  • Another participant expresses a love for the abstract nature of mathematics but acknowledges concerns about confidence and performance in early courses.
  • A later reply notes that many pure math graduates may face challenges finding work without strong project or research experience, while also highlighting the versatility of a pure math background for various professions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on what defines a true mathematician, with some emphasizing passion and love for the subject, while others focus on the challenges of proof-based learning and job prospects. No consensus is reached regarding the characteristics that define success in mathematics.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention the difficulty of transitioning from skill-based learning to proof-based mathematics, indicating a potential gap in expectations versus reality in mathematical education. There are also references to the abstract nature of pure mathematics and its applicability to other fields, which may not be universally agreed upon.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students considering a major in mathematics, educators seeking insights into student experiences, and individuals curious about the motivations and challenges faced by those pursuing pure mathematics.

curious mind 111
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
I've asked many... what does it mean to major in math (pure). I am a first year sophomore and still undecided about my major.I used to get full marks on math tests n high school, but how can I know if I'm able to be something in math. Anyone can learn how to do math, but few can actually make math...what characterizes a mathematician?
appreciate your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I majored in math at the University of Alaska during the 1980's. At the time, however, I had no idea that I am autistic. Not being the common social butterfly, I also had no idea of what to expect from such a cirriculum. I did fine as long as I didn't have to prove anything, even though differential equations is considerably more difficult than calculus; we called it "difficult" equations. But as it was, I simply took it a day at a time without knowing what to expect the next day, or in the next class. Then in my senior year, the theory came, and I was completely turned off. They take away the skill that you have, and make you prove what you know, beginning with basic math. If you become a teacher, you have to be able to show students why one is greater than zero. You have to be able to show, on paper, why 1+1=2, and so on and so forth, right on through to the calculus theorems.

If you're on an engineering team that's building bridges, for example, you have to be able to show why the math is valid, and if not, then why not. It simply was not my cup of tea.
 
As a pure math major you'll be focusing on abstract mathematics that isn't done with applications in mind. Your classes will be entirely proof based. Typical courses for a pure mathematician would be real analysis, abstract algebra, topology, number theory and the like. It gets very hard to wrap your brain around some of the concepts and proofs

I believe the biggest factor that separates the best students from the others is simply motivation and hard work. Except for a handful of geniuses, math isn't easy for anyone. It takes long hours of concentrated mental effort to excel in pure math. Math is a lot like a sport where you have to constantly practice and refine your skills if you want to be great at it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: kswgrad2012
have you read any of my thread formerly called "who wants to be a mathematician"? it's all about "the love", as they used to say about the nba. i don't want to be negative but you are asking the wrong question. i.e. you are asking how you can tell whether or not you willl be a "success", whereas the real mathematicians just want to know how they can pursue what they love. If you love doing math you will find fulfillment there, regardless of the "success" you find. but don't give up yet. you may have the love and just not have the confidence.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mohinder, kswgrad2012, StatGuy2000 and 2 others
thank you all for your replies...mathwonk: yes I do LOVEEEE the abstract of Mathematics and how perfect it can be...I love the logic behind it. Yes I do think it is a matter of confidence, yet justified. a lot of my friends that were math geniuses, didn't score high on the first math course and said that u'll hate math after it. I don't want to hate math...I'll read your thread .
 
Many pure Math majors I know of who didn't perform "above average" with projects and/or research to show had some trouble finding work right out of school, which is an anecdote to consider. Pure math is incredibly abstract, but is a great basis for just about anything -- applied mathematics, engineering, programming, etc.. As they say, "you can teach the mathematician X, but you can't teach the X mathematics" -- where X is any other profession. You probably won't run into a subject with as much abstraction as pure math unless you end up studying Physics (and maybe not even then). All that being said, if you're all in with mathematics, don't worry about the job bit -- that will fall into place easily if the passion and hard work is there. Good luck!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
8K