I What do applied mathematicians deal with?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter mech-eng
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Applied
AI Thread Summary
Applied mathematicians focus on using mathematical techniques to solve real-world problems in fields like physics, biology, chemistry, and economics, distinguishing themselves from pure mathematicians who prioritize theoretical concepts. The discussion highlights that while physicists also apply mathematics, the distinction lies in the approach and mindset, with applied mathematicians aiming to refine and clarify mathematical models. It is noted that many areas of pure mathematics, such as topology and geometry, have applications in physics, suggesting a blurred line between pure and applied mathematics. The conversation reflects a perception of rivalry between pure and applied mathematicians, emphasizing their differing priorities and methodologies. Overall, applied mathematics is seen as integral to various scientific disciplines, bridging theoretical concepts with practical applications.
mech-eng
Messages
825
Reaction score
13
TL;DR Summary
I am looking for the basic differences of applied mathematicians from pure mathematicians and physicists.
Hello. I have this question in my mind many years. I need to clarify my confused mind. I wonder how applied mathematicians differ from pure mathematicians and physicists. Many years ago I read that applied mathematicians and pure mathematicians do not like each other. Is this true? To me, as the name suggests, applied mathematics is application of mathematics, and this mostly happens in physics, biology (maybe computational biology?), chemistry and economics.

1. Physics also deals a lot with mathematics. Physicists already apply mathematics. There are even fields as "mathematical physics" and the books written on that fields full of application of mathematics to physical phenomena.

2. I have checked the fields of pure mathematics. One of them was topology and geometry. But aren't topology and geometry also find application in physics, so they are applicable fields, not pure.

Would you please explain the facts?

Regards,
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Pure mathematics is like classical music; applied mathematics is more like jazz; and physics is like rock and roll.
 
  • Love
  • Haha
Likes mcastillo356 and jedishrfu
A physicist would throw some equations together on the blackboard and say see that seems to work.

The applied mathematician would look at the mess and say we need to clean that up a bit.

The pure mathematician would say what's with all those numbers and ugh you use that brand of chalk, I only use Hagoromo chalk to write my sublime proofs found in The Book.



Dyson's life story may give an idea of the differences too:

https://plus.maths.org/content/freeman-dyson-dies-96
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude, topsquark, mech-eng and 1 other person
And here's Feynman's take on mathematicians:

 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude, topsquark and mech-eng
mech-eng said:
1. Physics also deals a lot with mathematics. Physicists already apply mathematics. There are even fields as "mathematical physics" and the books written on that fields full of application of mathematics to physical phenomena.
My mentor used to say: 'There are two types of physicists: mathematicians and blacksmiths.'

This probably describes the mindsets more than the actual fields.
mech-eng said:
2. I have checked the fields of pure mathematics. One of them was topology and geometry. But aren't topology and geometry also find application in physics, so they are applicable fields, not pure.
You can find applications for almost all parts of mathematics. If you look at the real world and take applied literally, then you are left with statistics and stochastics, maybe also numerical analysis (but this is widely substituted by shear computer power) as applied mathematics, and the rest is pure mathematics, regardless of any flimsy applications notwithstanding.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top