What Do Square Brackets Mean in History Books?

  • Thread starter Thread starter athrun200
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Book
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of square brackets in history books, particularly in the context of quoted material. Participants explore the implications of these brackets, including their role in editing quotes for clarity and accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that square brackets indicate edited quotes where additional words are added for clarity.
  • Others argue that square brackets are used to denote changes made to the original text, such as capitalization or the inclusion of missing parts.
  • A later reply explains that ellipses are used to indicate omitted sections of a quote, while "[sic]" is used to signify that a quoted error is part of the original text.
  • One participant provides an example of a heavily edited quote, referring to it as a "franken-quote," which raises questions about the integrity of the original text.
  • Another participant shares the original text to illustrate the use of brackets and ellipses, emphasizing the importance of context in understanding the edits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the function of square brackets in edited quotes, but there are nuances in how they interpret their application and the implications of editing. The discussion remains somewhat unresolved regarding the extent to which editing alters the original meaning.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the potential for varying interpretations of what constitutes an appropriate edit and the subjective nature of determining the integrity of a quote when alterations are made.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students, historians, and anyone interested in the nuances of quoting and editing texts in academic writing.

athrun200
Messages
275
Reaction score
0
When I read history books, I found there are some words written inside square brackets. What does that mean?

See my attachment
 

Attachments

  • 1.JPG
    1.JPG
    17.6 KB · Views: 429
  • 2.JPG
    2.JPG
    29.2 KB · Views: 474
Science news on Phys.org
That normally suggests that the passage is a quote that has been edited and so needs words added to make sense.
 
This would be correct - sections enclosed by square brackets inside a quotation are not part of the original text being quoted. There are lots of reasons for adding bits like this - usually to shorted the quote, comment, clarify, or shift blame.

n the second example, Carlyle is being quoted ... the start of the quote is "[A]ll" ... this tells you that the passage quoted is from the middle of a sentence - the actual word written was "all" but the rules of English mean it now needs a capital. Since that is not what Carlyle wrote, the cap has to be in square brackets.

Missing parts of the quote are indicated by elipses "..." (three dots). The Carlyle quote is so heavily edited we'd call it a "franken-quote" almost - a monster edited together from many parts.

This leaves "[sic]" which means "that is really how it appears in the original" - otherwise a grammar or spelling mistake in the original, and faithfully quoted, may be blamed on the author.

eg. Ryan_m_b wrote (above):
"[T]he passage is a quote that [sic] has been edited ... to make sense [of it]."
 
For reference, here is the original. Don't worry, it's in the public domain. If you compare the quotation to the original, you will see the meaning of the brackets and the ellipses. As Simon Bridge pointed out, [sic] refers to the fact that the word 'were', just before it, is incorrect but reported verbatim (in other words, blame Carlyle, not me). Sic is the latin word for 'so'.

Carlyle said:
They were the leaders of men, these great ones; the modellers, patterns,
and in a wide sense creators, of whatsoever the general mass of
men contrived to do or to attain; all things that we see standing
accomplished in the world are properly the outer material result, the
practical realization and embodiment, of Thoughts that dwelt in the
Great Men sent into the world: the soul of the whole world's history, it
may justly be considered, were the history of these. Too clearly it is a
topic we shall do no justice to in this place!

One comfort is, that Great Men, taken up in any way, are profitable
company. We cannot look, however imperfectly, upon a great man, without
gaining something by him. He is the living light-fountain, which it
is good and pleasant to be near. The light which enlightens, which has
enlightened the darkness of the world; and this not as a kindled lamp
only, but rather as a natural luminary shining by the gift of Heaven; a
flowing light-fountain, as I say, of native original insight, of manhood
and heroic nobleness;--in whose radiance all souls feel that it is well
with them.

http://www.gutenberg.org/dirs/1/0/9/1091/1091.txt"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thx for these useful information!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 84 ·
3
Replies
84
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 272 ·
10
Replies
272
Views
29K