What do the primes mean in this differential equation?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FredericGos
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Weird
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of notation in a differential equation presented in a book on classical and quantum physics. Participants explore the meaning of the primes used in the integral and the implications for understanding the equation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion regarding the use of primes in the notation of a differential equation and seeks clarification on its meaning.
  • Another participant suggests that the notation can be simplified to a more modern form without the primes.
  • A different participant explains that the prime notation represents a dummy variable, which is a common practice in mathematics, and notes that modern texts might use Greek letters instead.
  • Another response emphasizes that the notation is not outdated and clarifies that the integral must be a function of x, thus necessitating the use of a dummy variable like x'.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the interpretation of the prime notation as a dummy variable, but there are varying opinions on the necessity and modernity of the notation used.

Contextual Notes

Some assumptions about notation conventions and the context of the differential equation may not be explicitly stated, leading to potential misunderstandings for readers unfamiliar with the terminology.

FredericGos
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I'm reading an old book titled 'Mathematics of classical and quantum physics' by byron & fuller. It's quite nice, but some of the notation confuses me.

On page 388, they're showing a simple differential equation:

[tex]-i\frac{dy}{dx}=f(x)[/tex]

fine, but then they write the solution (given the initial condition y(a)=y0) as:

[tex]y(x) = y0 + i\int_a^x f(x')dx'[/tex]

These primes don't make any sense to me. What's up? Especially the one on the differential.
I would just have written the same thing without the primes.

I exspect this to be some kind of outdated notation, but it could also be that it just is something I've never seen. Can anyone tell me what's going on?

thx
Frederic
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's just another way to say [tex]y(x)=y(0)+i\int f(x) dx[/tex].
 
That x' is just a dummy variable. The only difference between this text and a more modern one is that the more modern text will use greek letters:

[tex]y(x) = y_0 + i\int_a^x f(\xi)d\xi[/tex]
 
The notation isn't outdated. The integral needs to be a function of x in order to make the equation make sense, and so the upper limit is x. Then, x' is a dummy variable-- this can really be anything you like (apart from x!).
 
Thx guys, of course! I get it now. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K