What does exactly constitute plagiarism?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chhitiz
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the distinction between plagiarism and patent rights. Plagiarism pertains to copyright infringement of written works, while patenting protects the ideas behind inventions. If a paper describes a new technology, the paper itself is copyrighted, but the idea can only be patented. Users must seek permission from patent holders if they intend to commercialize a product based on the idea, and they can quote sections of the paper with proper citation. If an idea is unpatented, it may still belong to its originator, and users must verify patent claims before proceeding with production.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of copyright laws related to written works
  • Knowledge of patent application processes
  • Familiarity with intellectual property rights
  • Awareness of citation practices in academic writing
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the differences between copyright and patent laws
  • Learn about the process of filing a patent in the United States
  • Explore best practices for citing academic papers
  • Investigate the implications of public domain status for inventions
USEFUL FOR

Individuals involved in product development, legal professionals in intellectual property, researchers, and anyone interested in understanding the nuances of plagiarism and patent rights.

chhitiz
Messages
221
Reaction score
0
just what i meant by the question. for example if a bloke wrote a paper on an innovative way to use web technology and another bloke used that paper to sell a product, does it amount to plagiarism or does the new method have to be patented first?
im not sure this should be posted in general discussion, but anyways.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You're talking about two separate issues. Plagiarism is specific to copyright, typically the written word, and is not related to patent. If someone wrote a paper on a new technology the paper itself is copyright protected. The idea in the paper would have to be patented which is a separate process and legal issue.

If you intend to sell a product based on the idea in the paper you need to check patents. Most likely it will be patented and if you are producing the product, not purchasing it from a distributor, you will have to ask permission from the holder of the patent rights to do so, which will most likely cost you if they even allow it.

As far as the paper is concerned you can quote short sections of it with citation in your brochure along with your sales pitch (do not solely reprint sections of the paper) and urge interested customers to find and read the paper for themselves if they wish more information. You could probably get away with printing out the paper and having it available to show customers but distributing (handing out/mailing/ect) copies of the paper without permission could get you in some trouble. If you intend to produce and distribute copies of the paper you can just ask permission from the author. In this case, as opposed to the patent case, you are more likely to get permission for free but I am not really familiar with how authors of research papers react to such requests.
 
TheStatutoryApe said:
If you intend to sell a product based on the idea in the paper you need to check patents. Most likely it will be patented and if you are producing the product, not purchasing it from a distributor, you will have to ask permission from the holder of the patent rights to do so, which will most likely cost you if they even allow it.

yes, but what if the idea is not patented?
would that be like a loophole or something?
 
chhitiz said:
yes, but what if the idea is not patented?
would that be like a loophole or something?

In the US, I am unsure about other countries, technically the idea still belongs to its progenitor. You may apply for a patent yourself and if the person who came up with the idea does not challenge it then you are fine. If you use the idea without patenting it it is possible that someone else may patent the idea and then you will have to deal with them. If you have been using the unpatented idea but are not the person who came up with it before it was patented by someone else you may have a case for rights to use it (I am unsure about more complex issues) but I think that like the creator you will be required to apply for patent in order to protect that right. I believe it is also legally your duty to check on any patent claims for an idea before you attempt to produce the idea yourself. If you proceed on the basis that you only think that no one else has a patent you will likely lose any case brought against you.
 
chhitiz said:
yes, but what if the idea is not patented?
would that be like a loophole or something?

An 'idea' cannot be patented. The product of an idea can be. If the product of the original idea from the original paper is over a year old and the originator of the product from the original paper hasn't filed for a patent (if there is a product described), then it is of the public domain. Also, if you make (or have made) an improvement to the original product, that improvement can be patented.

Anything that's of a written nature falls under the copyright laws of what ever country you are living if you publish it only in that country I believe. I don't know if there's any international copyrights available (you should check first), but I think you can file for a patent that covers some countries, but not all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
10K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
485
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
14K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K