What Does Frequent Paper Review Requests from a Journal Editor Signify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter womfalcs3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Academic Journals
AI Thread Summary
Receiving frequent review requests from an editor-in-chief, such as once a month, can indicate several things. It may suggest that the editor values the reviewer’s expertise and is considering them for a potential associate editor position. Alternatively, it could imply a lack of available reviewers in the field, leading to a more casual approach to peer review. The fact that the editor sends papers on different topics simultaneously, without additional comments, suggests a standard procedure rather than a personalized approach. Reviewers should consider these factors when assessing the significance of frequent review invitations.
womfalcs3
Messages
60
Reaction score
5
This can be a general thread that others may discuss their experiences. I have a question to which I couldn't readily find an answer:

What does it mean when the editor(in-chief, if it makes a difference) sends you papers to review often, like once a month? The editor even sends that person two papers that are on completely different topics at the same time.

Does it necessarily mean he likes you for a potential associate editor position at the journal? Could it mean he doesn't take peer-review seriously? There could be negative and positive views to take.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
 
mcastillo356 said:
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
Nothing special. The same content in every review invitation.
 
Reply
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'

Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
View full post »

Thread 'Status Update by JRMichler'

Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
View full post »

Similar threads

Editors of academic journals - Question
Replies
2
Views
1K
News Does 'pack journalism' shape the science news we read?
Replies
15
Views
3K
Web journals may turn peer-review system on its head
Replies
4
Views
3K
B Question about QM and Neuroscience
Replies
4
Views
1K
How Much Time Should Academics Spend on Peer Review?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is Self-Publication the Solution for a Rejected Paper?
Replies
16
Views
4K
Appealing arXiv moderators decisions
Replies
9
Views
6K
Other Name omitted from Professor's research paper- What should I do?
Replies
25
Views
5K
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
Replies
12
Views
3K
Peer Review: Objective or Subjective?
Replies
5
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top