What Does Frequent Paper Review Requests from a Journal Editor Signify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter womfalcs3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Academic Journals
Click For Summary
Receiving frequent review requests from an editor-in-chief, such as once a month, can indicate several things. It may suggest that the editor values the reviewer’s expertise and is considering them for a potential associate editor position. Alternatively, it could imply a lack of available reviewers in the field, leading to a more casual approach to peer review. The fact that the editor sends papers on different topics simultaneously, without additional comments, suggests a standard procedure rather than a personalized approach. Reviewers should consider these factors when assessing the significance of frequent review invitations.
womfalcs3
Messages
60
Reaction score
5
This can be a general thread that others may discuss their experiences. I have a question to which I couldn't readily find an answer:

What does it mean when the editor(in-chief, if it makes a difference) sends you papers to review often, like once a month? The editor even sends that person two papers that are on completely different topics at the same time.

Does it necessarily mean he likes you for a potential associate editor position at the journal? Could it mean he doesn't take peer-review seriously? There could be negative and positive views to take.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
 
mcastillo356 said:
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
Nothing special. The same content in every review invitation.
 
Reply
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356

Thread 'Why do we spend so little time learning grammar in college?'

To some degree, this thread is inspired by PF user erobz's thread "Why do we spend so much time learning grammar in the public school system?" That's why I made a title to this thread that paralleled the title of erobz's thread. I totally disagree with erobz. I created this thread because the curriculum of grammar at Universities is a totally distinct topic from the topic of the curriculum of grammar in public schools. I have noticed that the English grammar of many ( perhaps most)...
View full post »

Similar threads

Editors of academic journals - Question
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
News Does 'pack journalism' shape the science news we read?
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Web journals may turn peer-review system on its head
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
B Question about QM and Neuroscience
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
How Much Time Should Academics Spend on Peer Review?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is Self-Publication the Solution for a Rejected Paper?
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
Appealing arXiv moderators decisions
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Other Name omitted from Professor's research paper- What should I do?
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Peer Review: Objective or Subjective?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K