What Does Frequent Paper Review Requests from a Journal Editor Signify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter womfalcs3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Academic Journals
AI Thread Summary
Receiving frequent review requests from an editor-in-chief, such as once a month, can indicate several things. It may suggest that the editor values the reviewer’s expertise and is considering them for a potential associate editor position. Alternatively, it could imply a lack of available reviewers in the field, leading to a more casual approach to peer review. The fact that the editor sends papers on different topics simultaneously, without additional comments, suggests a standard procedure rather than a personalized approach. Reviewers should consider these factors when assessing the significance of frequent review invitations.
womfalcs3
Messages
60
Reaction score
5
This can be a general thread that others may discuss their experiences. I have a question to which I couldn't readily find an answer:

What does it mean when the editor(in-chief, if it makes a difference) sends you papers to review often, like once a month? The editor even sends that person two papers that are on completely different topics at the same time.

Does it necessarily mean he likes you for a potential associate editor position at the journal? Could it mean he doesn't take peer-review seriously? There could be negative and positive views to take.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
 
mcastillo356 said:
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
Nothing special. The same content in every review invitation.
 
Reply
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356
Thread 'RIP Chen Ning Yang (1922-2025)'

Thread 'RIP Chen Ning Yang (1922-2025)'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yang_Chen-Ning ( photo from http://insti.physics.sunysb.edu/~yang/ ) https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/18/science/chen-ning-yang-dead.html https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxrzzk02plo https://www.cpr.cuhk.edu.hk/en/press/mourning-professor-yang-chen-ning/ https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/physics/about/awards_and_prizes/_nobel_and_breakthrough_prizes/_profiles/yangc https://www.stonybrook.edu/commcms/physics/people/_profiles/yangc...
View full post »

Thread 'Rare Earth Magnets costs NZ teen part of his bowel'

"In 2013, after a series of hospitalizations due to magnets, New Zealand government officials permanently banned the sale of those made from neodymium-iron-boron (NIB)." https://www.sciencealert.com/new-zealand-teen-loses-part-of-his-bowel-after-swallowing-nearly-200-magnets "A 13-year-old boy in New Zealand has had part of his bowel surgically removed after he ingested nearly 200 high-powered magnets. (2025)" OK, this teen was a fool, but it is not always a teen, it is not always...
View full post »

Similar threads

Editors of academic journals - Question
Replies
2
Views
1K
News Does 'pack journalism' shape the science news we read?
Replies
15
Views
3K
Web journals may turn peer-review system on its head
Replies
4
Views
4K
B Question about QM and Neuroscience
Replies
4
Views
1K
How Much Time Should Academics Spend on Peer Review?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is Self-Publication the Solution for a Rejected Paper?
Replies
16
Views
4K
Appealing arXiv moderators decisions
Replies
9
Views
6K
Other Name omitted from Professor's research paper- What should I do?
Replies
25
Views
5K
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
Replies
12
Views
3K
Peer Review: Objective or Subjective?
Replies
5
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top