What Does Frequent Paper Review Requests from a Journal Editor Signify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter womfalcs3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Academic Journals
AI Thread Summary
Receiving frequent review requests from an editor-in-chief, such as once a month, can indicate several things. It may suggest that the editor values the reviewer’s expertise and is considering them for a potential associate editor position. Alternatively, it could imply a lack of available reviewers in the field, leading to a more casual approach to peer review. The fact that the editor sends papers on different topics simultaneously, without additional comments, suggests a standard procedure rather than a personalized approach. Reviewers should consider these factors when assessing the significance of frequent review invitations.
womfalcs3
Messages
60
Reaction score
5
This can be a general thread that others may discuss their experiences. I have a question to which I couldn't readily find an answer:

What does it mean when the editor(in-chief, if it makes a difference) sends you papers to review often, like once a month? The editor even sends that person two papers that are on completely different topics at the same time.

Does it necessarily mean he likes you for a potential associate editor position at the journal? Could it mean he doesn't take peer-review seriously? There could be negative and positive views to take.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
 
mcastillo356 said:
Your concern is understandable. Did he/she just send you that papers on other topics, without any additional remark?
Greetings!
Nothing special. The same content in every review invitation.
 
Reply
  • Informative
Likes mcastillo356

Thread 'Predictions for the Nobel Prize in Physics 2025'

Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...
View full post »
Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

Thread 'My experience as a hostage'

I believe it was the summer of 2001 that I made a trip to Peru for my work. I was a private contractor doing automation engineering and programming for various companies, including Frito Lay. Frito had purchased a snack food plant near Lima, Peru, and sent me down to oversee the upgrades to the systems and the startup. Peru was still suffering the ills of a recent civil war and I knew it was dicey, but the money was too good to pass up. It was a long trip to Lima; about 14 hours of airtime...
View full post »

Similar threads

Editors of academic journals - Question
Replies
2
Views
1K
News Does 'pack journalism' shape the science news we read?
Replies
15
Views
3K
Web journals may turn peer-review system on its head
Replies
4
Views
3K
B Question about QM and Neuroscience
Replies
4
Views
1K
How Much Time Should Academics Spend on Peer Review?
Replies
4
Views
2K
Is Self-Publication the Solution for a Rejected Paper?
Replies
16
Views
4K
Appealing arXiv moderators decisions
Replies
9
Views
6K
Other Name omitted from Professor's research paper- What should I do?
Replies
25
Views
5K
News Post-Scientific Technocratic Methodologies
Replies
12
Views
3K
Peer Review: Objective or Subjective?
Replies
5
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top