What Does It Mean When Field Quanta Are Not Spatially Localized?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter I2004
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Field Quanta
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 2K views
I2004
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
what does it mean when someone says field quanta are not spatially localized?

does it mean they are in superpostion or they are just moving very fast?

sorry if I sound daft
 
Physics news on Phys.org
and are field quanta virtual particles that pop in and out of existence?

I read "field quanta are not spatially localized since they are not excition states at a certain point of the field but have to be assigned to the field system as whole"

can someone explain why they have to be assigned to the system as a whole?


please help...
 
Last edited:
When describing a complex system we try to use the excitations which are simplest, namely the normal modes. For a free field the normal modes are the plane waves. A disturbance that was initially localized would not stay that way, it would spread to neighboring points and be rather difficult to deal with!
 
what I don't get is when it says you must take into account the whole field.

like these field quanta spread across the whole universe, because the field is everywhere...
 
Last edited:
I just don't get it when he says they are not exition states at a point in the field.

what are they then? a single quantum is spread everywhere?

please help...