What Does Kenneth W. Ford Mean by More Energetic Particles in The Quantum World?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter daisey
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electric
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the interpretation of a statement made by Kenneth W. Ford in his book "The Quantum World," specifically regarding the behavior of "more energetic particles" in the context of charge and pairing. Participants explore the implications of this statement in relation to atomic structure and particle interactions, raising questions about the nature of energetic particles and their interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that "more energetic particles" refers to particles with sufficient energy to not be bound by electrical forces and instead scatter off each other.
  • Others question whether "more energetic particles" pertains to heavier atoms like helium and oxygen or to fundamental particles such as muons and tauons.
  • It is proposed that even oppositely charged particles can scatter if their kinetic energies are too high to allow for binding.
  • One participant draws an analogy to celestial mechanics, suggesting that particles with high momentum may behave similarly to objects escaping a gravitational field.
  • A question is raised about the behavior of stationary oppositely charged particles and whether they would attract like protons and electrons do.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing interpretations of what constitutes "more energetic particles," and there is no consensus on whether this refers to heavier atoms or fundamental particles. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of energy on particle interactions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the complexity of defining "more energetic particles" and the assumptions involved in discussing particle interactions, particularly in relation to kinetic energy and binding forces.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those studying quantum mechanics, particle physics, or anyone looking to understand the nuances of particle interactions as described in Kenneth W. Ford's work.

daisey
Messages
131
Reaction score
3
I am reading Kenneth W. Ford's book entitled "The Quantum World". On page 22 under the introduction section to Charge, he talks about how charges lead to pairing. In that paragraph he states...

"The hydrogen atom...consists of an electron and a proton held together by electrical attraction. More energetic particles don't pair up as the result of electrical forces; they merely deviate from a straight path."

Can someone please explain what Kenneth means by the statement in RED?

When he talks about "more energetic particles", is talking about atoms with more mass such as such as helium, oxygen, etc. Or is he talking about other heavier fundamental particles (Muons and Tauons)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
By more energetic, he means having so much energy that they are not bound, but scatter off each other.
 
So he is saying other particles that are oppositely charged just scatter off each other? He is talking about other fundamental particles?
 
Even particles of opposite charge can scatter if their kinetic energies are too large to get bound.
 
If two other types of particles are not moving (no kenetic energy), and are oppositely charged, will they also attract like protons and electrons
 
daisey said:
I am reading Kenneth W. Ford's book entitled "The Quantum World". On page 22 under the introduction section to Charge, he talks about how charges lead to pairing. In that paragraph he states...

"The hydrogen atom...consists of an electron and a proton held together by electrical attraction. More energetic particles don't pair up as the result of electrical forces; they merely deviate from a straight path."

Can someone please explain what Kenneth means by the statement in RED?

When he talks about "more energetic particles", is talking about atoms with more mass such as such as helium, oxygen, etc. Or is he talking about other heavier fundamental particles (Muons and Tauons)?

"More energetic particles" means "particles with a higher momentum". It's similar to things orbiting around the sun. If an object has a velocity that's too high, it'll leave the solar system and never return, but if the velocity's not too high, it'll just orbit around the sun in an ellipse, or possibly a circle. (I'm not saying electrons orbit nuclei like planets -- they don't -- but energy-wise, it's the same idea.)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
12K
  • · Replies 135 ·
5
Replies
135
Views
12K