What Does kT/hc Signify in Derivations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Randomchemstudent
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Derivations
AI Thread Summary
kT/hc signifies a measure of energy at a specific temperature, expressed in cm^-1. This term is commonly encountered in thermodynamic and statistical mechanics contexts. It helps relate thermal energy to other physical quantities in derivations. Understanding kT/hc is crucial for grasping concepts in energy distribution at various temperatures. This clarification enhances comprehension of related derivations in physics.
Randomchemstudent
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Like the title- what's kT/hc?
Relevant Equations
kT/hc= 207.224cm^-1 (for example)
My lecturer was going through a derivation, and I'm a bit stumped as to what kT/hc actually signifies. Like what is it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it a measure of energy in cm^-1?
 
Yes, basically. To be exact, it’s a measure of energy at a specific (experimentally relevant) temperature.
 
  • Like
Likes Randomchemstudent
TeethWhitener said:
Yes, basically. To be exact, it’s a measure of energy at a specific (experimentally relevant) temperature.

Thanks, that cleared that up!
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'

TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
View full post »

Thread 'Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)'

I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
View full post »

Similar threads

B What is physical significance of the direction of angular velocity?
Replies
2
Views
1K
Chemistry How to understand the zeroth law through these specific equations?
Replies
3
Views
2K
Understanding Photon Energy: Help Needed for Chemistry Student
Replies
3
Views
1K
Chemistry Understanding chemical potential of gas in mixture versus pure gas, used in derivation of equilibrium constant
Replies
1
Views
1K
Chemistry Why can we differentiate this entropy total derivative with repect to Temperature?
Replies
5
Views
3K
Electric Field of a Toroid carrying a changing current I = kt on axis
Replies
2
Views
788
Deriving E(ave)=kT: Is it Correct?
Replies
2
Views
1K
I Fourier Transformation on a Ring
Replies
11
Views
3K
Solving Newton's 2nd Law for Particle Falling in Medium
Replies
4
Views
2K
I deriving a pupil function in a coherent imaging system
Replies
2
Views
1K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top