MHB What Does Rejecting the Null in ANOVA but Not Hartley's FMAX Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter melissahalliwel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    anova
melissahalliwel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What does it mean when I reject the null in an ANOVA but fail to reject the null when doing something such as Hartleys FMAX?

Also, what's the difference between ANOVA AND T-TEST?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
melissahalliwel said:
What does it mean when I reject the null in an ANOVA but fail to reject the null when doing something such as Hartleys FMAX?

Hi melissahalliwel, welcome to MHB!

ANOVA and Hartley test for different things.
The ANOVA tests whether the means of several groups are the same.
Hartley tests if the variances of the groups are similar.

Rejecting the null in ANOVA means there is a group with a different mean.
Failing to reject Hartley means that the variances of the groups are assumed to be similar (even if their means are not).

melissahalliwel said:
Also, what's the difference between ANOVA AND T-TEST?

A textbook will list a whole set of characteristics for each of them.
Anyway, let me try to put some of it in just a couple sentences.

A t-test compares two means.
An ANOVA compares variances. ANOVA is also considered a generalized t-test, as we use it when we have more than 2 groups.

A t-test compares the means directly using a t-distribution.
An ANOVA is an ANalysis of VAriances, meaning it compares variances using an F-distribution.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.

Similar threads

Replies
43
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top