MHB What Does Rejecting the Null in ANOVA but Not Hartley's FMAX Mean?

  • Thread starter Thread starter melissahalliwel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    anova
AI Thread Summary
Rejecting the null hypothesis in ANOVA indicates that at least one group mean differs from the others, while failing to reject Hartley's FMAX suggests that the variances among the groups are similar. ANOVA assesses the means of multiple groups, whereas Hartley's test focuses on variance comparison. The t-test, in contrast, specifically compares the means of two groups directly using a t-distribution. ANOVA is viewed as a generalized t-test for scenarios involving more than two groups, utilizing an F-distribution for variance analysis. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for proper statistical interpretation in research.
melissahalliwel
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
What does it mean when I reject the null in an ANOVA but fail to reject the null when doing something such as Hartleys FMAX?

Also, what's the difference between ANOVA AND T-TEST?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
melissahalliwel said:
What does it mean when I reject the null in an ANOVA but fail to reject the null when doing something such as Hartleys FMAX?

Hi melissahalliwel, welcome to MHB!

ANOVA and Hartley test for different things.
The ANOVA tests whether the means of several groups are the same.
Hartley tests if the variances of the groups are similar.

Rejecting the null in ANOVA means there is a group with a different mean.
Failing to reject Hartley means that the variances of the groups are assumed to be similar (even if their means are not).

melissahalliwel said:
Also, what's the difference between ANOVA AND T-TEST?

A textbook will list a whole set of characteristics for each of them.
Anyway, let me try to put some of it in just a couple sentences.

A t-test compares two means.
An ANOVA compares variances. ANOVA is also considered a generalized t-test, as we use it when we have more than 2 groups.

A t-test compares the means directly using a t-distribution.
An ANOVA is an ANalysis of VAriances, meaning it compares variances using an F-distribution.
 
I'm taking a look at intuitionistic propositional logic (IPL). Basically it exclude Double Negation Elimination (DNE) from the set of axiom schemas replacing it with Ex falso quodlibet: ⊥ → p for any proposition p (including both atomic and composite propositions). In IPL, for instance, the Law of Excluded Middle (LEM) p ∨ ¬p is no longer a theorem. My question: aside from the logic formal perspective, is IPL supposed to model/address some specific "kind of world" ? Thanks.
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...
Back
Top