What Does Subtracting the Identity from a Transformation Mean in Nomenclature?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter pamparana
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Nomenclature
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mathematical concept of subtracting the identity transformation from a transformation function, specifically in the context of displacement fields. The transformation function, denoted as s, maps a point p to s(p), while the identity transformation is represented as I. The expression u = s - I defines the displacement field, indicating how the transformation alters the position of points in space. The notation (s - I)(p) is used to clarify the resulting vector field associated with the transformation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of transformation functions in mathematics
  • Familiarity with vector fields and displacement concepts
  • Knowledge of identity transformations in linear algebra
  • Basic grasp of mathematical notation and nomenclature
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of transformation functions in linear algebra
  • Learn about vector fields and their applications in physics
  • Explore the concept of identity transformations in various mathematical contexts
  • Investigate the implications of displacement fields in mechanics and geometry
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and students studying transformations and vector fields, particularly those interested in the application of these concepts in mechanics and theoretical physics.

pamparana
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have a question about nomenclature and it may be a bit more than simple nomenclature as I am not quite sure I understand it:

So, I am reading a paper and going through it very slowly as it is quite intense. But one of the line is as follows:

Suppose the transformation s maps a point p to the point s(p). Let u = s - I be the displacement field associated with the transformation s.

I am confused as to what s - I represents. The subtracting of the identity from a transformation seems strange to me.

I always thought the displacement field can be simply represented for each particle by associating a vector with each particle...

I hope someone can clarify this doubt for me.

Many thanks,

Luc
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess, they try to describe the vector by saying the vector is defined by its starting point and end point u = (x_2-x_1, y_2-y_1) and s((x_1,y_1)) = (x_2,y_2).

They probably used the notation (s-I)(p)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K