What does the Math Grad committee think?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grad
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concerns of a participant regarding the inclusion of a poor grade from a Linear Algebra course taken during high school in their graduate school applications. The conversation explores the implications of past academic performance on future opportunities in graduate programs, particularly in mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses anxiety about including a poor grade in Linear Algebra on their graduate school applications, fearing it may negatively impact their chances despite strong performance in subsequent math courses.
  • Another participant suggests that graduate committees may prioritize recent academic performance over earlier grades, indicating that a history of improvement can be viewed positively.
  • Some participants share personal experiences of being accepted into graduate programs despite having poor grades earlier in their academic careers, suggesting that individual circumstances can vary widely.
  • There is a caution against attempting to hide poor grades, with a participant emphasizing that honesty is crucial in applications, as incomplete applications may be rejected.
  • Concerns are raised about the variability in how different graduate programs evaluate applications, with some participants noting that certain schools may focus more on recent performance or overall character rather than isolated poor grades.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that a single poor grade is unlikely to disqualify an applicant, but there is no consensus on how much weight committees place on earlier grades versus recent performance. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best approach to disclosing past academic performance.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the variability in graduate school admission processes and the importance of individual circumstances, but specific criteria or policies from different institutions are not detailed.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering graduate school applications, particularly those with concerns about past academic performance, may find this discussion relevant.

Dens
Messages
74
Reaction score
0
When I was in high school, I took Linear Algebra at a local community college (concurrent studies) and unfortunately did poorly (grade-wise, college class first time = nervous and panic results writing dumb stuff on exams). I am a rising fourth year and it's time to think about grad school

Now I have a problem and I think you already know what it is. When I make my application they all want me to post every post-secondary I have attended. After contacting a few grad schools, some say they feel I should include that Linear Algebra class I once took, some say they just want to see my BSc transcript and nothing else, and there were some grad programs that even ignored my email on this matter which I do not know why.

Technically on the safe and honest side I should include everything, but if they see my embarrassing grade I cannot imagine what might do to my application.

Sure I've pretty much aced every Math class I've encountered as far, but I am afraid they might see the Linear Algebra course and think "okay this guy probably knew the stuff before hand, hence we shall treat all the A+ he had in other math courses as rubbish. On to the next application!". In particular I don't have any outstanding research/publication (if any) to boast about, and my cumulative GPA is not 4.0 either. (I should mention my department is really small, so grad classes are all pretty much crosslisted with undegrad classes - called 'special topics' and I am planning to enrol into one noncross-listed course)Therefore I feel like the mistakes of my youth are coming to haunt me.

Of course I have no proof this is the case and this is why I am making this thread. So just give your thoughts, I know every committee is different. If my fears are true I might not even attend graduate school and will go for an education degree instead because I need a job (not to sure mention that I am going have to double my $ for ordering transcripts, yuck!)

Finally for the schools who says they just want to see my BSc transcript, do you think it will hurt my application a lot of if I tell them about that Linear Algebra class I took? If for some reason the grad committee changes their mind without my knowledge, how are they going to check that Linear Algebra course I once took?

I should also mention that I am applying to North American universities.

Thank you for reading
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically on the safe and honest side I should include everything, but if they see my embarrassing grade I cannot imagine what might do to my application.
The schools vary so much it is impossible to tell - you should specify who you are applying to so others who know it can comment.

I got into grad school because of bad grades earlier ... so you seriously can never tell.

From your information - you will probably be best to prefer grad schools who responded to your email, particularly if they said they don't care about the bits with the bad grades. Should ease your concerns.
 
Simon Bridge said:
I got into grad school because of bad grades earlier ... so you seriously can never tell.

That is something I've never heard before.

I'd certainly be interested in hearing more about this.
 
ZombieFeynman said:
That is something I've never heard before.

I'd certainly be interested in hearing more about this.

I don't think you should be worry about grades *that early* in your education. What is important here is to show that you have grown up and matured along the way. That's probably what Simon meant, but maybe he could elaborate.
 
I managed to beat some people I knew with similar final BSc grades to me because of the way my earlier grades improved from very bad. They said it showed how I responded positively to failure. I wasn't going to argue.

OTOH: I have heard of grades being examined right back to high school where there is lots of competition from straight A+ students and a policy to select only the highest grades. Some just take the firs N students who meet the minimum standard.

What I'm trying to illustrate is that there really is no way of telling.

My gut reaction is that people tend not to check the courses you list unless something really stands out - anything you did at the college already is available to them anyway so the request for other stuff will be for flavor. All the candidates will be BSc/BSc(Hons) with very similar papers and if the grades weren't good they wouldn't be applying - so they want to see who looks like they'll be different or get a sense of your character.
 
In the US, at least, grades towards the end of your BS tend to matter much more than grades at the beginning. Like Simon, I was accepted into grad. school despite (or, perhaps, because of - I was pretty heavily recruited by the department chair at the school I wound up attending) extremely poor grades early in my undergraduate work. (To give you an idea of how poor, I actually flunked out of one undergrad institution, and was forced to finish up at a second school.)
 
Thanks friends for replying. I am wondering, Simon, when did you get into grad school? I am assuming competition is much fierce today
 
Before I go further, while one can never tell what a particular committee will think, in general they give more recent information more weight.

That said, I think it's a serious mistake to try and fool the committee, and an even more serious mistake to show any dishonesty whatever. Most schools realize that they can tolerate a student who is not quite as bright better than one who is dishonest - so they won't admit anyone whose application shows a whiff of that.

If they ask for everything, send them everything. Don't send them part of it and pretend its all of it.
 
It sounds to me like you're stressing over nothing.

A single bad course is highly unlikely to put you out of the running for graduate school, particularly one from four or five years ago that is inconsistent with a record of high achievement since. In general graduate schools ask for your marks from ALL post-secondary institutions. If you do not include them, your application is considered incomplete and rejected. Attempting to hide a poor performance is a risky and dishonest move.
 
  • #10
Dens said:
Thanks friends for replying. I am wondering, Simon, when did you get into grad school? I am assuming competition is much fierce today
That was a while ago and in New Zealand. It would have been a lot tougher to get into Oxford for eg.

Some colleges are in more demand than others.
Some schools within a college have more applicants than others.
Who you know can help too - especially if a researcher particularly wants you for a grad student.
There are so many variables.
 
  • #11
The major problem is that I actually repeated my first years because I was so embarrassed. SO I took Linear Algebra again after first years and my first year wasn't spectacular either.

I will include everything, rest assure.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K