I What does the product part of Laughlin wave function mean?

George Keeling
Gold Member
Messages
181
Reaction score
41
TL;DR
confused by product symbol with two subscripts
I am looking at the Laughlin wave function and it contains the term
$$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q$$
In Wikipedia the lower index on ##\Pi## is ##1\le i<j\le N## and there is no upper index. I'm not sure what either mean. For example would
$$\prod_{j<k}^{N}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q=\prod_{k=2}^{N}\left[\prod_{j=1}^{k-1}\left(z_j-z_k\right)^q\right]?$$
(It seems that ##k## cannot be 1 because there would be nothing to multiply in the second product). I'm not sure what else the expression could mean.

For ##N=3## that would give ##\ \left(z_1-z_2\right)^q\left(z_1-z_3\right)^q\left(z_2-z_3\right)^q## I think.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this is the meaning of that product symbol with two subscripts.
 
  • Like
Likes George Keeling, Demystifier and pines-demon
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...
I read Hanbury Brown and Twiss's experiment is using one beam but split into two to test their correlation. It said the traditional correlation test were using two beams........ This confused me, sorry. All the correlation tests I learnt such as Stern-Gerlash are using one beam? (Sorry if I am wrong) I was also told traditional interferometers are concerning about amplitude but Hanbury Brown and Twiss were concerning about intensity? Isn't the square of amplitude is the intensity? Please...
This is still a great mystery, Einstein called it ""spooky action at a distance" But science and mathematics are full of concepts which at first cause great bafflement but in due course are just accepted. In the case of Quantum Mechanics this gave rise to the saying "Shut up and calculate". In other words, don't try to "understand it" just accept that the mathematics works. The square root of minus one is another example - it does not exist and yet electrical engineers use it to do...
Back
Top