What does this sentence mean (literature)

  • Thread starter Thread starter ppppparker
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Literature Mean
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the interpretation of the phrase "an appeal open from criticism to nature" from Samuel Johnson's Preface to Shakespeare. Participants agree that Johnson suggests the rules of nature supersede the rules of criticism, allowing for the coexistence of seriousness and levity in Shakespeare's works. The metaphor of a court is used to illustrate that while criticism may judge a work harshly, nature—representing real life—provides a higher standard for evaluating artistic merit. Ultimately, the purpose of poetry is to instruct by pleasing, regardless of conventional literary rules.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with literary analysis and criticism
  • Understanding of Samuel Johnson's contributions to literary theory
  • Knowledge of Shakespeare's works and their thematic complexities
  • Basic grasp of literary terminology, including "poetics" and "dramatic rules"
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore Samuel Johnson's Preface to Shakespeare for deeper context
  • Research the concept of "rules of criticism" in literary theory
  • Study Shakespeare's blending of genres in his plays
  • Examine the role of nature in literary criticism and its implications
USEFUL FOR

Literary scholars, students of English literature, and anyone interested in the intersection of criticism and artistic expression in Shakespeare's works.

ppppparker
Messages
18
Reaction score
4
Its one specific phrase that is confusing me and its from Samuel Johnson's Preface to Shakespeare.
I bolded the exact words that are giving me problems and I also provided the sentences before and after to provide context. (I understand what he is saying wrt how Shakespeare mixes comedy and tragic, --its just that specific phrase "an appeal open from criticism to nature" that I don't get.

Johnson says:
"Almost all his plays are divided between serious and ludicrous characters, and, in the successive evolutions of the design, sometimes produce seriousness and sorrow, and sometimes levity and laughter. That this is a practice contrary to the rules of criticism will be readily allowed; but there is always an appeal open from criticism to nature. The end of writing is to instruct; the end of poetry is to instruct by pleasing.

Thanks for any help or ideas
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Silicon Waffle
Physics news on Phys.org
"appeal
  1. a serious or urgent request, typically one made to the public.
  2. an application to a higher court for a decision to be reversed.
  3. the quality of being attractive or interesting."
So, I think he's using "appeal" in the second sense, and means that it is always possible to go to the higher court of 'Nature' to reverse a ruling by the lower court of 'Criticism'.

By the 'rules of criticism', you shouldn't weave back and forth between seriousness and levity in the same work. But that happens in Nature all the time, and the rules of Nature supercede the rules of criticism, so it's actually OK to go back and forth between seriousness and levity in the same work.

That's my take on it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Hornbein, epenguin, Silicon Waffle and 1 other person
thanks much .. I think u nailed it, even though u said that's your take on it. I know what was confusing me now, it was the use of the court metaphor and also that "nature" (basically) = "real life" or maybe something like reality TV. ANyway, my completed sentence (ir ur interested) is "Even though Shakespeare's unorthodox methods often violate conventional rules of criticism, they don't violate real life, which is a superior measure of a plays worth".
The only part I'm unsure about now is the word "criticism" (if this should be the "rules of drama" or poetics or whatever Johnson means when he says "the ancients"
Thanks a lot for the fast help
 
ppppparker said:
The only part I'm unsure about now is the word "criticism" (if this should be the "rules of drama" or poetics or whatever Johnson means when he says "the ancients"
I'm pretty sure it's just #2 below:
crit·i·cism/ˈkridəˌsizəm/
noun
  1. the expression of disapproval of someone or something based on perceived faults or mistakes.
  2. the analysis and judgment of the merits and faults of a literary or artistic work.
 
I'd say 'nature' here is not supposed to mean 'real life' or natural world, but 'the nature of a (something)' - its purpose, or character.
So as the purpose of poetry is to instruct by pleasing, it is its nature to do so.

Taking it all together, the paraphrased passage would say: 'while such way of writing runs contrary to the standard rules of assessing literary works, in the end what counts is not whether something conforms to the rules, but whether it succeeds in achieving its intended purpose.'
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K