What does this subscript signify?

  • Thread starter Thread starter shanepitts
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the interpretation of subscripts in mathematical expressions related to optics physics. The first expression, involving the partial derivative of a wave function, indicates that the variable x is held constant while differentiating with respect to time t. The second expression relates to the Fresnel equations, suggesting that the subscript denotes the amplitude of the electric field being perpendicular to the interface of two media. Context is crucial for accurately understanding the meaning of these subscripts. Overall, the participants clarify their interpretations based on textbook references and the specific applications of these expressions.
shanepitts
Messages
84
Reaction score
1
I am currently taken an undergrad Optics physics course, and I am often coming across functions/derivative that have subscripts. I know what those specific symbols mean but I don't know what their relationship is suppose to be. i.e.

{(δΨ/δt)x}=ω

or

(Eor/E0i)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You will get better answers of you can tell us more about exactly where you found these expressions and how they're being used. I and many other people here could make some good guesses, but these subscripts are often used with meanings that are only clear in context... So we need that context to give you more than guesses.
 
  • Like
Likes shanepitts
Nugatory said:
You will get better answers of you can tell us more about exactly where you found these expressions and how they're being used. I and many other people here could make some good guesses, but these subscripts are often used with meanings that are only clear in context... So we need that context to give you more than guesses.
The first expression after looking it up states that the this is the partial derivative of a wave function with respect to t, holding the x constant. Hence, I presume that he subscript here means that variable is held constant.
 
shanepitts said:
The first expression after looking it up states that the this is the partial derivative of a wave function with respect to t, holding the x constant. Hence, I presume that he subscript here means that variable is held constant.

Seems likely...
 
  • Like
Likes shanepitts
After looking it up, and reading your reply, I think I got my answer. The textbook states that, the first expression is the partial derivative of a wave function with respect to t, holding the x constant. Hence, I presume that the subscript here means that the variable is held constant.

The second expression is the left side of one of the Fresnel equations; discussing the interaction of an electromagnetic field and the interface of two different mediums. I think the subscript means that the amplitude of the electric field is perpendicular to the interface. Not sure if more could be implied by this particular subscript.

Does that sound right?
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
596
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K