MHB What else could we do? (p-adic expansion)

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Expansion
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

I want to find the p-adic expansion of $\frac{1}{p}$ and $\frac{1}{p^r}$ in the field $\mathbb{Q}_p$.

So, do I have to solve the congruences $px \equiv 1 \pmod {p^n}, p^r x \equiv 1 \pmod { p^n }, \forall n \in \mathbb{N} $, respectively?

But.. these congruences do not have solutions, right? (Thinking)

What else could we do, in order to find the p-adic expansion of $\frac{1}{p}$ and $\frac{1}{p^r}$ in $\mathbb{Q}_p$ ? (Worried)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If you are trying to express 1/p and 1/p^r as a list of p-adic integer digits,
{a0, a1, a2, ... }
then it is correct " these congruences do not have solutions"

These are not p-adic integers. The digit list has non-zero an, for n<0.

Case 1/p:
all digits zero except a-1 = 1

Case 1/p^r:
all digits zero except a-r = 1

Examples: 1/5 and 1/5^3 as 5-adic
View attachment 3455
Conventions as in this DEMO
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    8.3 KB · Views: 87
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top