What happen when photon passing through highly charged field?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AlienUFO
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charged Field Photon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the behavior of photons in the presence of highly charged electromagnetic (EM) fields. Participants explore the implications of photons interacting with these fields, questioning the nature of such interactions and the validity of the initial question posed.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question the meaning of "passing through highly charged field" and seek clarification on what is meant by the term "field."
  • One participant asserts that photons do not interact with electromagnetic fields because they are not charged particles, suggesting that uncharged particles like photons and neutrons are unaffected by such fields.
  • Another participant emphasizes that photons are the quanta of the electromagnetic field and thus do not "pass through" fields in a traditional sense.
  • There is a discussion about the validity of the question regarding photons and EM fields, with some arguing that it violates principles of quantum mechanics, specifically the particle-wave duality.
  • Participants express uncertainty about the strength of the EM field required to observe any effects on photons, with suggestions of different field strengths like 80 MV/m and 80 EV/m.
  • One participant raises the question of whether strong magnetic fields would yield different results compared to electric fields.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial question regarding photons and highly charged fields. There are competing views on the nature of photons' interactions with EM fields, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Participants express limitations in defining what constitutes a "high" EM field, leading to ambiguity in the discussion. The interaction of photons with EM fields is framed within the context of quantum mechanics, which complicates the inquiry.

AlienUFO
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I think I had seen it elsewhere, but I can't found it now. What happen when photon passing through highly charged field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What do you mean by "passing through highly charged field" ? What field ?

Keep in mind that photons do NOT interact with photons (at least not directly, in higher order perturbation theory they do interact through hadronization but i am sure that will take us too far)

marlon
 
I think you misunderstand 'passing through highly charged field', my question like electron being accelerate by negative field, deflected by positive field...

Charged particle is significantly shows interaction with charged field. So how about uncharged particles like neutron and photon going under these very highly charged field? I remember there still be some kind of reaction under critic condition, I had read.
 
AlienUFO said:
I think you misunderstand 'passing through highly charged field', my question like electron being accelerate by negative field, deflected by positive field...
Well, that is indeed what i asumed you meant to say in the first place. The answer i gave concerning photons stays the same.

I remember there still be some kind of reaction under critic condition, I had read.
Dunno 'bout that but fact is that uncharged particles (electrically as well as magnetically "un"charged) are NOT affected by the presence of the EM field. As a matter of fact, the electroncharge e expresses the strength of interaction of the EM force mediated by photons. In short : e is the coupling constant of the EM interaction. So, no e equals no EM interaction. It is as simple as that. Same counts for the magnetic part which is dual to the electric part.

marlon
 
marlon said:
Keep in mind that photons do NOT interact with photons (at least not directly, in higher order perturbation theory they do interact through hadronization but i am sure that will take us too far)

marlon

I just surf through internet find no article about 'photon hadronization', indeed I do, but all in mathematical expression, which I can't understand.

OK, what I want is a direct and simple answer: What is the result when photon passing through very high EM field?
 
I'm no expert, but as far as I know photons are not affected by electromagnetic fields, since they are not charged particles.
 
AlienUFO said:
OK, what I want is a direct and simple answer: What is the result when photon passing through very high EM field?
A photon does not pass through a very high EM field. Photons are the EM field, meaning that they are the quanta of vibrating EM fields. What i CAN tell you is that photons do not interact with photons in lowest order perturbation theory.

marlon
 
Oh... ok...

marlon said:
A photon does not pass through a very high EM field.

marlon


The photon don't pass through high EM field? I don't understand. You mean photon undergoes some different traveling method within high EM field?
 
AlienUFO said:
The photon don't pass through high EM field? I don't understand. You mean photon undergoes some different traveling method within high EM field?
No not "some different travelling", i mean NO TRAVELLING AT ALL.

Actually, you ask an invalid question. Why ? Because it violates one of the foundations of QM. The particle wave duality states that you can EITHER use the particle picture (photons) OR the wavelike picture (EM waves which correspond to vibrating EM fields) but NOT BOTH AT THE SAME TIME. You are doing the latter because you use both photons and EM fields at the same time. So, either we talk about photons (WHICH DO NOT MUTUALLY INTERACT, except indirectly through hadronization) or we talk about EM fields.

marlon

edit : hadronization
 
Last edited:
  • #10
AlienUFO said:
OK, what I want is a direct and simple answer: What is the result when photon passing through very high EM field?

How HIGH of a field? Would 80 MV/m do?

Zz.
 
  • #11
marlon said:
No not "some different travelling", i mean NO TRAVELLING AT ALL.

Actually, you ask an invalid question. Why ? Because it violates one of the foundations of QM. The particle wave duality states that you can EITHER use the particle picture (photons) OR the wavelike picture (EM waves which correspond to vibrating EM fields) but NOT BOTH AT THE SAME TIME. You are doing the latter because you use both photons and EM fields at the same time. So, either we talk about photons (WHICH DO NOT MUTUALLY INTERACT, except indirectly through hadronization) or we talk about EM fields.

marlon

edit : hadronization

Why? You mean I cannot even started to shoot a real photon into the field?

ZapperZ said:
How HIGH of a field? Would 80 MV/m do?

Zz.

what is the matter? at this high value will make something different?
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
How HIGH of a field? Would 80 MV/m do?

Zz.
That's too weak for anything noticable I suppose.:smile:
Maybe 80 EV/m would do,but I don't know...
How about the same question but regarding "strong" magnetic fields?:confused:
Way higher spatial densities of energy are possible to realize and tame in a lab by magnetic fields than by electric fields.
 
  • #13
AlienUFO said:
what is the matter? at this high value will make something different?

I don't know, I am asking you since you just said "high". This is vague and ambiguous. Remember, YOU were the one who asked this, and presumably, there was some REASON for you to be asking such a question, then I'm asking you what do you mean by "high". It would be silly for ME to be the one defining what YOU mean by "high field", wouldn't it?

Zz.
 
  • #14
AlienUFO said:
Why? You mean I cannot even started to shoot a real photon into the field?
No, i mean that you cannot be talking about photons and EM fields AT THE SAME TIME. This violates QM.


marlon
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K