Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the fate of human bones following the 1922 Massacre at Smyrna, particularly the claim that they were shipped to Britain for industrial purposes. Participants explore the historical context and implications of this event, as well as the potential uses of bones in industry.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant recalls a book mentioning that human bones from the Smyrna massacre were shipped to Britain, suggesting they were intended for industrial use rather than burial.
- Another participant references Robert Fisk's column in the Independent, indicating contemporary discussions about the massacre.
- A question is raised about the industrial uses of animal bones, prompting a discussion about their applications.
- Some participants assert that bones can be used to make fertilizer, specifically noting the distinction that these were human bones.
- There is speculation about whether there was a shortage of animal bones in England during that time, questioning the rationale behind shipping human bones.
- A light-hearted comment is made about fine bone china, referencing the use of bones in its production.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants do not reach a consensus on the reasons for the shipment of bones or their intended use, and multiple viewpoints regarding the historical context and implications remain present.
Contextual Notes
The discussion lacks specific historical evidence or sources to substantiate claims about the shipment of bones and their industrial applications. Assumptions about the motivations behind the shipment and the context of bone usage are not fully explored.
Who May Find This Useful
Readers interested in historical events related to the Ottoman Empire, industrial uses of biological materials, or the cultural implications of historical atrocities may find this discussion relevant.