What Happened When Alpha Particles Were Aimed at Gold Foil?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the historical significance of Rutherford's gold foil experiment conducted between 1909 and 1911, which disproved Thomson's plum pudding model of the atom. If Thomson's model had been accurate, alpha particles aimed at gold foil would not have been scattered at large angles, as observed in Rutherford's findings. This experiment fundamentally altered the understanding of atomic structure, leading to the development of the nuclear model of the atom.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of atomic models, specifically Thomson's plum pudding model and Rutherford's nuclear model.
  • Familiarity with alpha particles and their properties.
  • Knowledge of experimental methods in physics, particularly the Geiger-Marsden experiment.
  • Basic grasp of scattering theory and its implications in atomic physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Geiger-Marsden experiment and its methodology.
  • Study the transition from Thomson's model to Rutherford's nuclear model of the atom.
  • Explore the implications of Rutherford's findings on modern atomic theory.
  • Investigate the role of alpha particles in nuclear physics and their applications.
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching atomic theory, and anyone interested in the historical development of atomic models and experimental physics.

Davidmb19
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Between 1909 and 1911 the current model of an atom was Thomson's plum pudding however this was disproved by Rutherford's experiment. So the question is, if Thomson's model was true what would of happened when the alpha particles was aimed at the gold foil?
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
562