What If Bush Admin Institutes Martial Law?

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter TheStatutoryApe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores hypothetical scenarios regarding the potential imposition of martial law by the Bush administration and the implications for the electoral process. Participants consider various outcomes, including the legality of such actions, the role of Congress, and the responsibilities of the Secret Service and military in such a situation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants speculate on the circumstances under which martial law could be declared and the rationale behind it, such as terrorist threats to voting stations.
  • There are claims that if elections were canceled without justification, Congress would likely impeach the President, but the process could be complicated by emergency laws.
  • Some argue that the physical location of the President would not affect the transition of power, as the new President would be sworn in regardless of the outgoing President's actions.
  • Concerns are raised about the Secret Service's role, with some noting that their responsibility is to the office of the Presidency rather than the individual President, and that they are not a personal army.
  • Participants discuss the limits of presidential control over the military and the likelihood that military officers would refuse to follow unlawful orders.
  • There are humorous contributions suggesting absurd scenarios, such as marching bullfrogs taking control, indicating a mix of serious and light-hearted responses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the feasibility and implications of martial law, with no clear consensus on the outcomes or the likelihood of various scenarios occurring. Disagreements exist regarding the roles of different branches of government and the military's response to potential presidential overreach.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexity of legal and procedural responses to a hypothetical martial law scenario, including the potential for emergency laws and the implications for the electoral process.

TheStatutoryApe
Messages
301
Reaction score
3
What If...

I'm sorry if this doesn't seem a very serious topic but I would prefer serious responses so I'm putting it here.

So what happens if, for what ever reason, the Bush admin institutes Martial Law and tries to cancel the elections? I understand that the elections are supposed to continue regardless but what if they try to stop them anyway? Maybe there have even been terrorist attacks and/or threats to voting stations and voters that would give them a rationale for suspending the elections, or at least delaying them.
Perhaps they don't even succeed in stopping the elections but Bush and his people simply dig their heels in and refuse to leave regardless. Would he simply be arrested? and just how likely do you think it is that they would find the people willing to arrest him and that there would be enough secret service willing to go along with his arrest? and what happens if there aren't?

I've heard people express worry that Bush may try such a thing and I really have no idea what sort of provisions there are for resolving such an issue. Especially if no one is willing to simply arrest him.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
TheStatutoryApe said:
I'm sorry if this doesn't seem a very serious topic but I would prefer serious responses so I'm putting it here.

So what happens if, for what ever reason, the Bush admin institutes Martial Law and tries to cancel the elections? I understand that the elections are supposed to continue regardless but what if they try to stop them anyway? Maybe there have even been terrorist attacks and/or threats to voting stations and voters that would give them a rationale for suspending the elections, or at least delaying them.
Perhaps they don't even succeed in stopping the elections but Bush and his people simply dig their heels in and refuse to leave regardless. Would he simply be arrested? and just how likely do you think it is that they would find the people willing to arrest him and that there would be enough secret service willing to go along with his arrest? and what happens if there aren't?

I've heard people express worry that Bush may try such a thing and I really have no idea what sort of provisions there are for resolving such an issue. Especially if no one is willing to simply arrest him.

If he canceled or delayed elections in a situation that didn't warrant it, then Congress would impeach him. If the situation were so dangerous and chaotic that Congress couldn't meet - well, that's what the emergency laws that so many are upset about are designed to cover. An appropriate situation to declare martial law would be pretty obvious to all.

If he refused to leave, it wouldn't change anything. The new President would be sworn in as usual and laws passed by Congress would be sent to the new President to approve or veto. It's the position that's important. The White House is just where the President lives.

If Bush refused to leave the White House, then I guess you'd go through the normal process every landlord wanting to evict a tenant has to go through. Hopefully the authorities would move the Bush family's possessions to a warehouse or something. It looks kind of tacky if they just sit them out on the curb (plus it would be hard to keep tourists from stealing them - possessions of a Presidential family would have quite a bit of collector value).
 
Also, the secret service's responsibility is the the office of the Presidency, not the sitting President himself. All of the major candidates already have secret service protection, so it isn't like the secret service is Bush's personal army.

Bush has no actual control over the elections or the other branches of government. His control over the military and the SS is limited by the fact that they are citizens of the US. Military coups are not really part of our vocabulary and at some point in the chain of command, the officers would simply refuse to transmit his orders. He has no direct control over any officers who actually have direct control over troops. By and large, our military is true citizen soldiers: patriots. It is not comprised of mindless automotons nor power-mad fascists.

As Bob said, his physical location is irrelevant - he can barricade himself in his room with a few loyal secret service agents to guard the door, but that won't actually change anything.

Barring some extreme stroke of luck Bush would have to commit a Hitler-style terrorist attack on his own government (with deniability) to be able to stay in power past his term.
 
Last edited:
Also, the secret service's responsibility is the the office of the Presidency, not the sitting President himself. All of the major candidates already have secret service protection, so it isn't like the secret service is Bush's personal army.


Bush can hire "Blackwater USA" to be his personal army though
 
mjsd said:
Bush can hire "Blackwater USA" to be his personal army though

A small private army has nothing on the US army. Since the new President would be the acting Commander in Chief, he and Congress could deploy the US Army and get help from, say, GBR. The US Congress can authorize it to avoid flying in the face of Posse Comitatus. So it could be a show-down of Blackwater versus Delta Force & SAS.

Who will be responsible for the snacks? :confused:
 
The answer is obvious... marching bullfrogs with machine guns will oust Bush and install their leader until the crisis passes.

You did say "what if'...
 
chemisttree said:
The answer is obvious... marching bullfrogs with machine guns will oust Bush and install their leader until the crisis passes.
I was just going to say that!
 
rrribbitt!
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
9K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K