What is a singlet under SU(3)?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jinbaw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Singlet
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A singlet under SU(3) is defined as a one-dimensional representation that has zero eigenvalue under the Casimir operators, analogous to the singlet state in SU(2) which satisfies the equation S± |0⟩ = 0. The notation 3 x 3(bar) = 8 + 1 indicates that the direct product of the fundamental representation 3 and its conjugate 3(bar) results in a reducible representation consisting of a singlet 1 and an octet 8. The discussion also highlights the importance of Young tableaux for computing products of irreducible representations, particularly in the context of SU(3) and SU(2).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory, specifically SU(3) and SU(2)
  • Familiarity with Casimir operators and their role in representation theory
  • Knowledge of irreducible representations (irreps) and their decomposition
  • Basic concepts of tensor products in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Young tableaux for computing products of irreducible representations in unitary groups
  • Learn about the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients for decomposing two-particle spin states
  • Explore the properties of Casimir operators in various Lie algebras
  • Investigate the implications of tensor products in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, mathematicians specializing in group theory, and students studying quantum mechanics and particle physics, particularly those interested in the representation theory of Lie groups.

jinbaw
Messages
65
Reaction score
0
what is a singlet under SU(3)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


and what is SU(3)xSU(3)?
What do we mean by 3 x 3(bar) = 8 + 1?
 


A singlet of any algebra is the state that has zero eigenvalue under the Casimir operators. These are the generators of the center of the algebra and are simultaneously diagonalizable. The singlet state is a one-dimensional representation. For instance, for SU(2), the singlet state satisfies

\vec{S}^2 |0\rangle = 0,

i.e., it is the s=0 state. It satisfies

S_{\pm} |0\rangle = 0

as well, so there are no other states in this representation.

SU(3)\times SU(3) refers to a direct product of two SU(3) groups. States or particles will simultaneously be in some representation of both groups.

\mathbf{3} \otimes \bar{\mathbf{3}} = \mathbf{1} \oplus \mathbf{8} refers to a direct product of the \mathbf{3} representation with the \bar{\mathbf{3}}. The resulting representation is what's known as reducible and can be written as a direct sum of the singlet \mathbf{1} and octet \mathbf{8} representations.

This relationship is analogous to the way we decompose two-particle spin states in QM. There, for SU(2), the decomposition of specific product states into states of irreducible representations is summed up by the Clebsch-Gordan coefficients.
 


Okay, that explains a singlet. Thanks.
But what I still can't get is how we know that it is 1 + 8. For example i need to find what 3 x 3 x 3 is. How can I do that?
 


jinbaw said:
Okay, that explains a singlet. Thanks.
But what I still can't get is how we know that it is 1 + 8. For example i need to find what 3 x 3 x 3 is. How can I do that?

You might want to look up Young tableaux, which are very useful for computing products of irreps for unitary groups. They are a pictorial way of keeping track of the symmetries of irreducible tensor representations. Alternatively, there are various places to find tables of products.

In your case, we should first compute \mathbf{3}\otimes\mathbf{3}. Thinking of the fundamental irrep \mathbf{3} like a vector, this product is a rank 2 tensor. There is an antisymmetric product which is the \bar{\mathbf{3}} and the symmetric product which is the \mathbf{6}. So we have

\mathbf{3}\otimes\mathbf{3} = \bar{\mathbf{3}}\oplus \mathbf{6}.

Now we already know that \mathbf{3} \otimes \bar{\mathbf{3}} = \mathbf{1} \oplus \mathbf{8}, so it remains to compute \mathbf{3} \otimes \mathbf{6}. We can either antisymmetrize the new index with the indices on the symmetric tensor, which gives us the \mathbf{8}, or we can totally symmetrize the rank 3 tensor, which gives us the \mathbf{10}. Therefore

\mathbf{3} \otimes \mathbf{6} = \mathbf{8}\oplus \mathbf{10}.

Putting it all together, we have

\mathbf{3}\otimes\mathbf{3}\otimes\mathbf{3} = \mathbf{1} \oplus \mathbf{8}\oplus\mathbf{8}\oplus \mathbf{10}.

As a sanity check, you can compare the total dimensions of the representations on both sides.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
940