What is best way to start learning DMRG for Fermions?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on learning the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method specifically for fermionic systems, particularly the Hubbard model. Participants highlight the lack of introductory resources addressing the complexities of fermionic DMRG, such as handling half-filling and the sign issue associated with fermionic operators. Recommendations include exploring PhD theses and utilizing ITensor with the Jordan-Wigner transformation to tackle these challenges. The conversation also references an open-source DMRG project aimed at traditional formalism.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) methodology
  • Familiarity with fermionic systems, specifically the Hubbard model
  • Knowledge of the Jordan-Wigner transformation
  • Basic experience with numerical diagonalization techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implementation of DMRG for fermionic systems in the Hubbard model
  • Study the sign problem in fermionic operators and its solutions
  • Explore the use of ITensor for DMRG applications
  • Review PhD theses related to fermionic DMRG techniques
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students interested in computational physics, particularly those focusing on fermionic systems and the DMRG method.

Luqman Saleem
Messages
17
Reaction score
3
I want to learn the density matrix renormalization group (DMRG) method in traditional formalism (not MPS). While there are many good introductory level articles available for bosonic (and spin) systems, I have not encountered any introductory level article which deals with fermionic systems i.e. Hubbard model and its variants. All articles mention the DMRG algorithm (for the finite and infinite chain) but none of them explicitly explains it for fermionic systems. i.e. how to do half-filling, 3/4 filling e.t.c.

Do you happen to know any introductory level article which explains the technicalities of fermionic DMRG? If there are not any such article, can you please shed some light on the fermionic DMRG.

Thank you so much in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I wanted to add sometime Hubbard chains to my open source DMRG project (described here: https://compphys.go.ro/density-matrix-renormalization-group/ - it's the 'old style', for MPS I have a TEBD project, too) but I don't have enough time for it.

There is a sign issue that complicates things for fermionic operators, that's why the simple implementations and tutorials are avoiding it. You might find the links on my blog helpful, I think I pointed out at least two ways of dealing with the issue - some PhD thesis that deals with Hubbard models and I also pointed the way ITensor deals with it, with the Jordan-Wigner transformation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: atyy and Luqman Saleem
aaroman said:
I wanted to add sometime Hubbard chains to my open source DMRG project (described here: https://compphys.go.ro/density-matrix-renormalization-group/ - it's the 'old style', for MPS I have a TEBD project, too) but I don't have enough time for it.

There is a sign issue that complicates things for fermionic operators, that's why the simple implementations and tutorials are avoiding it. You might find the links on my blog helpful, I think I pointed out at least two ways of dealing with the issue - some PhD thesis that deals with Hubbard models and I also pointed the way ITensor deals with it, with the Jordan-Wigner transformation.

First of all, thank you so much for that open source project. I actually started with your work. The PhD thesis that you have mentioned helped me in dealing with the sign problem. I guess, right now I am not able to understand the diagonalization of a Hamiltonian in the subspace of particles. I have explained it in more details here https://www.physicsforums.com/threa...agonalize-a-hamiltonian-in-a-subspace.965747/
I will be very thankful if you could have a look at it and tell me what am I missing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 388 ·
13
Replies
388
Views
176K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K