What is Dark Matter? - Learn Its Properties & Particles

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FeDeX_LaTeX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dark matter Matter
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of dark matter, its properties, and potential particle composition. Participants explore various hypotheses and ideas related to dark matter, including its invisibility and implications for the universe's structure.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about what dark matter is, noting that it is described as an invisible form of matter that does not emit electromagnetic radiation.
  • There are suggestions that dark matter could consist of unaccounted black holes, undiscovered particles, or neutrinos, but no consensus on its exact composition exists.
  • A participant mentions that dark matter is posited to exist due to anomalies in galaxy rotation, referencing Vera Rubin's work.
  • One participant proposes a speculative idea that atoms could have existed before the Big Bang and suggests they might have been oriented in a disc shape, raising questions about their visibility and energy requirements for reshaping.
  • Another participant introduces the analogy of digital watches and spiders to discuss invisibility, but this is challenged as not being relevant to dark matter.
  • Discussion includes references to historical observations, such as Zwicky's identification of missing mass and the virial theorem, as well as the role of dark matter in explaining large-scale structures in the universe.
  • There is a debate about the nature of atoms and particles, with some participants arguing against the notion of atoms having specific shapes and discussing the implications of the Big Bang on particle interactions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views on the nature of dark matter and its properties, with no clear consensus reached. Some ideas are speculative and contested, particularly regarding the pre-Big Bang existence of atoms and their shapes.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding dark matter, including the speculative nature of certain ideas and the dependence on current scientific models, which may not fully account for all observations.

FeDeX_LaTeX
Science Advisor
Messages
436
Reaction score
13
Hello;

What is dark matter? I have been told from numerous sources that it is simply an invisible form of matter that is undetectable by its electromagnetic radiation. However, that does not explain what it is, that just tells me that I can't see it.

What particles does dark matter consist of? What properties does dark matter exhibit?

Thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
FeDeX_LaTeX said:
Hello;

What is dark matter? I have been told from numerous sources that it is simply an invisible form of matter that is undetectable by its electromagnetic radiation. However, that does not explain what it is, that just tells me that I can't see it.

What particles does dark matter consist of? What properties does dark matter exhibit?

Thanks

No one knows exactly what dark matter is composed of yet (or more accurately if it even exists). They think it could be unaccounted for black holes, an undiscovered type of particle, neutrinos, etc. Its only even posited to exist because of an anomaly in the way galaxies revolve ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vera_Rubin ) that does not mesh with our present scientific model of the universe .

Here's a good documentary on dark matter:


BBC also has a good documentary on the topic:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRMdLO_My9A&feature=SeriesPlayList&p=49560DAA7B8CD529
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Is it possible to ask a question here?
 
amezcua said:
Is it possible to ask a question here?

you just asked one :).
 
All things are possible... And, in response to the question I believe you wanted to ask, yes, you are allowed to ask questions here.

They must be relevant, though, I believe...
 
Thanks for the encouragement.I was being disconnected before I could complete my messages.Here`s a question about Dark Matter. Is it possible that atoms existed before the Big Bang which were oriented like a disc.and they were damaged in the explosion?That would make them "visible".So we live in a universe made out of "bent"atoms. Think of a spinning bicycle wheel.It takes a lot of energy to turn with that.How much energy would it take to straighten out all the bent atoms.
 
Add to the last question the idea of digital watches.The orientation of molecules in the number display will render invisibility possible with a small charge.Some spiders render themselves invisible by rapidly shaking themselves.They had never seen a propellor when they started doing that.
 
One simple rule of thumb relating to explosions in a market place is that for every person killed there will be roughly 6 times more injured.That roughly fits the mismatch in the Dark Matter scenario.
 
Simply put, dark matter is the missing mass necessary to explain the observed gravitational attraction between galaxies. Zwicky first noticed this missing mass nearly a century ago. See virial theorem and the bullet cluster for more detail. Dark matter is also necessary to explain large scale structure in the universe [filaments].
 
  • #10
Chronos .This idea of mine is just something for others more expert to play with..The centre of my question is the idea of atoms (pre-Big Bang ) being similar in shape to Galaxies which have the familiar flat layout. Many planets which arrived late in some galaxies were stuck in odd angles to the rest.Most galaxies seem to be quite well aligned . Maybe gravity between flat atoms would be too strong for them to separate. If one wanted a disc shaped atom how much energy would be needed to reshape it ? Is this question just an old "chestnut"?
 
  • #11
amezcua said:
Add to the last question the idea of digital watches.The orientation of molecules in the number display will render invisibility possible with a small charge.Some spiders render themselves invisible by rapidly shaking themselves.They had never seen a propellor when they started doing that.
no that's not the same thing. those molecules would be detectable like other molecules if they were in a nebula (if there was enough of it) it wouldn't be dark matter. those are "normal molecules" in the watches and in the spiders
Maybe gravity between flat atoms would be too strong for them to separate. If one wanted a disc shaped atom how much energy would be needed to reshape it ? Is this question just an old "chestnut"?
atoms don't have shapes, they are collections of particles in a stable equilibrium (aka like "orbit") due to their interactions (aka like gravity). the "shape of the atom" is determined by how the electrons interact with themselves mostly. but the "shape of the atom" is statistical/a "probability-cloud", aka, a picture of where the different components are more likely to be at any particular time

so it doesn't make sense to think of atoms themselves as discs or balls

i can tell you're confusing atoms with particles though. you can't have atoms that go through the big bang... the big bang came through a point too small for that, the atoms would break apart even if you could "have atoms before the big bang"

so your question could be rephrased "do particles have a sort of shape, and did the big bang alter the shape of a large set of particles that came into the universe at the start of the universe?"

that question is highly speculative... it's all over the place lol
The centre of my question is the idea of atoms (pre-Big Bang ) being similar in shape to Galaxies which have the familiar flat layout
for this to be the case, the particles would have had to be interacting with each other differently before the big bang, the big bang altering their properties. there is no particular reason to believe this. yeah there are probably a myriad of weird unkown particles in unknown multidimensional universes. but for this particular idea i think it's coming from a misconception of what particles and spacetime actually are (not that anyone knows for sure)
 
  • #12
Thanks for the discussion. I guess we'll have to wait a few more years to find more evidence for this phenomenon...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K