What is Degeneracy of Dark Matter?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of "degeneracy" in the context of dark matter and dark energy, as articulated by Martin Kunz in "The Dark Degeneracy: On the number and nature of dark components." Degeneracy refers to the inability to distinguish between different models of dark energy and dark matter based on observational data, particularly due to the constraints imposed by gravity on the total energy momentum tensor. This results in multiple models yielding similar observational effects, complicating the understanding of the universe's expansion and structure formation. The lack of a microphysical theory or direct detection exacerbates the issue, allowing for an infinite variety of phenomenological models without rigorous physical justification.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of energy momentum tensor in general relativity
  • Familiarity with dark energy and dark matter concepts
  • Knowledge of observational cosmology techniques, such as supernovae data analysis
  • Basic grasp of model degeneracies in theoretical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "energy momentum tensor in cosmology" for deeper insights into its role in gravitational interactions
  • Explore "dark energy models" to understand the various theoretical frameworks
  • Study "supernovae data analysis" techniques to learn how they inform cosmological models
  • Investigate "phenomenological models in physics" to comprehend their implications in theoretical frameworks
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, cosmologists, theoretical physicists, and anyone interested in the complexities of dark matter and dark energy models.

priced02
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone - I'm having some trouble with the real concept behind "degeneracy" of dark matter.

I've heard of degeneracy before in maths (eg. a 'point' is a degenerate 'circle'), and in physics (eg. energy level degeneracy in atom shells), but I don't quite see how either of these work when we're talking about dark energy. From what I understand, in this context degeneracy is a 'bad' thing - but is it anomalous to error, arbitrary-ness, or the maths/physics definition?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Degeneracy dosn't mean 'bad' as such, but you will need to be a bit more specific in your question since there are several things you could be talking about in your question. Can you give an example of where the term was used that confused you?
 
Some examples

From "The Dark Degeneracy: On the number and nature of dark components" - Martin Kunz.

"We use that gravity probes only the total energy momentum tensor to show how this leads to a degeneracy for generalised dark energy models. Because of this degeneracy, Omega-m cannot be measured."

"Gravity therefore only constrains the total w(z). Any further freedom, like sub-dividing the dark EMT into dark matter and dark energy, or introducing cou-
plings between the dark constituents, cannot be directly measured and will introduce degeneracies."
 
Okay, so what that means in that context is that there are many different models for dark energy and dark matter that look the same observational, so by degenerate Kunz means that you can't distinguish them hence you cannot know which theory is correct. I.e. do you have this much stuff that behaves in this way or a different amount that behaves in a different way per unit density such that the effect on the expansion is the same?

I remember reading that paper when it was first published and thinking that they didn't show well enough how the same degeneracy exists in structure data as exists in supernovae data. It's very exist to construct a variety of models that give the same a(t) (which is all that SN probe) but that have different structure statistics.

In the end though model degeneracies is an issue for dark energy (and cosmology generally) at the moment, since there is no micro physical theory or direct detection in the lab. There is essentially infinite freedom to make up phenomenological models without having to have a rigorous physical theory to explain the reasons behind the behavior.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K