What Is Fire and How Does It Fit into the States of Matter?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the classification of fire within the context of states of matter, exploring whether fire can be categorized as a solid, liquid, gas, or another form of matter such as plasma. Participants examine the nature of fire and its components, as well as the broader implications of defining states of matter.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that fire could be a combination of solid and gas or liquid and gas, depending on the fuel material being burned.
  • Others argue that fire is a partial plasma, consisting of gas atoms with some electrons stripped away, which contributes to the visible light produced.
  • There is a discussion about the existence of other states of matter beyond solid, liquid, and gas, including plasma, Bose-Einstein condensates, and degenerate matter, though the classification of these states is debated.
  • One participant expresses uncertainty about whether certain forms of matter should be considered distinct states, questioning the utility of the classification system.
  • Another participant points out that plasma is a distinct state of matter due to significant changes in physical properties compared to gases.
  • There is a mention of superfluid helium as an example of a state of matter that exhibits unique properties.
  • Some participants reflect on the implications of categorizing states of matter, suggesting that the distinctions may not be as useful as previously thought.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the classification of fire or the utility of the states of matter framework. Multiple competing views remain regarding what constitutes a state of matter and the implications of these classifications.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of states of matter, the dependence on specific physical properties for classification, and unresolved questions about the categorization of certain forms of matter.

wirefree
Messages
110
Reaction score
21
If every thing is either 'solid', 'liquid' or 'gas' then what is fire?


wirefree
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What would your answer be?

Looks to be a combination of either solid+gas (solid fire) or liquid+gas (liquid fire). Depends on what fuel material is burning:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fire

Remember the fire triangle -- heat, fuel, oxygen.
 
First, everything is not solid, liquid, or gas. There are many other forms of matter, such a plasma. The flame you see is, in fact, a partial plasma. It's composed of gas atoms, some of which have electrons stripped from them. The recombination of these free electrons with the atoms is what produces the visible light.

- Warren
 
Oh, good point! I spaced the plasma part of it. Kind of like your avatar...:biggrin:
 
chroot said:
First, everything is not solid, liquid, or gas. There are many other forms of matter, such a plasma.

I know about solids, liquids, gasses and plasmas. What other forms of matter exist?
 
Einstein-Bose condensates, degenerate matter (such as in a neutron star)... but I'm not sure if they're really considered 'states' in the official sense of the term.

edit: Holy cats, Chroot. That list is making my eyes hurt.
 
Danger said:
Einstein-Bose condensates, degenerate matter (such as in a neutron star)... but I'm not sure if they're really considered 'states' in the official sense of the term.

Of course they are. Even simple things like their pressure-volume relationships are distinctly different than 'ordinary' states like gas and liquid.

- Warren
 
chroot said:
First, everything is not solid, liquid, or gas. There are many other forms of matter, such a plasma. The flame you see is, in fact, a partial plasma. It's composed of gas atoms, some of which have electrons stripped from them. The recombination of these free electrons with the atoms is what produces the visible light.

- Warren

Just don't remember being taught that in school.

Appreciate that, chroot!
 
  • #10
Wow I have a feeling most people here know about the things on the list, but just didn't consider them to be categorized as their own state of matter! Thats definitely what i thought of Amorphous solids.
 
  • #11
It's not a very useful question - it's a bit like "how many seas are there".
I would say that there are solids,liquids,gases.
Once you start adding Bose-Einstein condensates etc then you have to pretty much have a different state for each material. A metal is different from a glass so are they different states of matter?
I would argue that even plasma is just a charged gas - it behaves differently to a gas but then so does a magnetised solid.
 
  • #12
Again, plasma is a distinct state of matter, because several physical quantities (like heat capacity) change abruptly when moving from the gas state to the plasma state. Futhermore, there's a jump in free energy between a gas and a plasma -- you have to add energy to dissociate the atoms.

- Warren
 
  • #13
There's also a pretty impressive change when helium goes superfluid!
I don't know if plasma is more fundamental jus because it was discovered earlier.

My point was that 'states of matter' is not as useful a distinction as it used to be now that we know about macroscopic quantum effects.
It's a bit like the 'number of planets' question - do you count every rock, is Pluto a planet - arguing about where the boundary lies doesn't really tell you much about orbital mechanics.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
924
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K